Talk:Four Big Pollution Diseases of Japan

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Article title edit

Somebody moved this article to a new title Pollution in Japan, but the article is about the well-known subject of the "Big Four Pollution Diseases" of Japan, a direct translation of the name yondaikōgaibyō, which is a very notable subject inside Japan (see e.g. Almeida P and Stearns L, Soc. Probs., 45(1):37-60, 1998). There is already an article Environmental issues in Japan‎, which covers all environmental issues, including pollution. I suggest leaving this article with its original title, unless there is a clear consensus for a change. - Neparis (talk) 20:20, 5 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

I've changed the capitalization to use sentence case instead of title case per WP:MOS. WhatamIdoing (talk) 19:20, 2 July 2009 (UTC)Reply
I've changed it back, 四大公害病, yondaikōgaibyō is an actual title and how it is transliterated into English. Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 13:24, 3 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

5 ? edit

Fukushima should be the fifth one... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.59.115.182 (talk) 16:58, 24 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Four Big Pollution Diseases of Japan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:23, 4 October 2017 (UTC)Reply