Talk:Feminist method

Untitled

The image is just a captioned joke meant to make fun of feminists. It is not at all encyclopedic and does NOT belong on wikipedia. http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_is_not_a_soapbox

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 21:12, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Feminist method in philosophy of science ?

And why not elena ceausescu in chemistry ? Is there someone serious who really think that ideology is compatible with science ? Come on... --90.48.172.88 (talk) 16:40, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

This article is not acceptable.

It's an incredible thing, to see such an article as this and marvel over who could have authored it or why. I especially like the part where it says: "...the objective fact that nothing can be looked at with an objective view". Beautiful. And then there's the gem: "The importance of feminist methods are... how [they] help the feminist movement". Priceless! No-matter why this article was written, and whoever the proponents of this 'Feminist method' are, I don't see any reason to treat it/them differently to any other pseudoscientific subject/person. This needs an overhaul and if no-one else is going to do it... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.12.141.127 (talk) 13:00, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Feminist method. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150503020145/http://www.rep.routlage.com:80/article/P020SECT3 to http://www.rep.routlage.com/article/P020SECT3

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:51, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Psuedoscience

How is conforming your research to a political ideology not considered pseudoscience? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.66.159.125 (talk) 03:12, 27 June 2018 (UTC)