Talk:ExifTool
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the ExifTool article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 28 August 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
Hang on edit
This is an important tool with notable aspects. I need a little bit of time for a rewrite to remove any copyvio problems. Roguegeek (talk) 21:53, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
Missing table? edit
The entry for "jpg/jpeg" refers to a "following table", which I extracted from Phil's web site. HiTechHiTouch (talk) 18:41, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
- Should be resolved
Jesus Presley (talk) 07:15, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
- Should be resolved
Operating Systems edit
I added Linux as it had been omitted, and minutes later it was moved to the end of the listed OSes, with Wikipedia:GEVAL given as the reason. Alphabetically, Linux should be first. It's a GPL project, so Linux should be first. What is the justification for putting Windows first in an article about a free software project? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.51.235.86 (talk) 20:52, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
It is nothing to do with GEVAL which says not all viewpoints are equally valid. But note the editor who made the change is a member of the Microsoft Project. 87.112.127.60 (talk) 06:22, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Delete/merge Supported JPEG metadata section? edit
Why is there a need for the separate JPEG metadata section? The current supported file formats has quite a few of the filetypes already. Can it be merged/deleted? Blackhole944055886 (talk) 12:49, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
- This was simply copied from ExifTool documentation. Imho both those lists fall under Wikipedia:INDISCRIMINATE and do not provide much value, especially, that this type of information can easily become outdated. – K4rolB (talk) 16:32, 28 October 2022 (UTC)