Talk:Ernst Klink

Latest comment: 5 years ago by K.e.coffman in topic GA Review

Sources edit

K.e.coffman (talk) 17:37, 10 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:Ernst Klink/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Catrìona (talk · contribs) 08:21, 11 October 2018 (UTC)Reply


Comments to follow. Catrìona (talk) 22:41, 9 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

This article is in very good shape.

  • I would recommend tweaking the lede to make it more clear what HIAG was, and how his affiliation with that organization affects evaluation of his scholarship.
Expanded on his work in the lead. --K.e.coffman (talk) 00:40, 12 October 2018 (UTC)Reply
  • {{sfn|MüllerUeberschär|2002|p=85}} Is this a valid citation style, or do you mean {{sfn|Müller|Ueberschär|2002|p=85}}?
Fixed. --K.e.coffman (talk) 00:40, 12 October 2018 (UTC)Reply
Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose ( ) 1b. MoS ( ) 2a. ref layout ( ) 2b. cites WP:RS ( ) 2c. no WP:OR ( ) 2d. no WP:CV ( )
3a. broadness ( ) 3b. focus ( ) 4. neutral ( ) 5. stable ( ) 6a. free or tagged images ( ) 6b. pics relevant ( )
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked   are unassessed