Talk:Entheogen/Archives/2021
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Orphaned references in Entheogen
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Entheogen's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "Endogenous opioid families - 2012 review":
- From Opioid peptide: Li Y, Lefever MR, Muthu D, Bidlack JM, Bilsky EJ, Polt R (February 2012). "Opioid glycopeptide analgesics derived from endogenous enkephalins and endorphins". Future Medicinal Chemistry. 4 (2): 205–226. doi:10.4155/fmc.11.195. PMC 3306179. PMID 22300099.
Table 1: Endogenous opioid peptides
{{cite journal}}: External link in|quote= - From Endorphins: Li Y, Lefever MR, Muthu D, Bidlack JM, Bilsky EJ, Polt R (February 2012). "Opioid glycopeptide analgesics derived from endogenous enkephalins and endorphins". Future Medicinal Chemistry. 4 (2): 205–26. doi:10.4155/fmc.11.195. PMC 3306179. PMID 22300099.
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 06:59, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
Lack of sources / unreliable sources
This article is plagued by sources that do not meet Wikipedia's reliable sources guidelines (WP:RS) and by material that has no sources at all. In order to do justice to the important topic of the article, I will be removing material that doesn't have good sources. The article has had a template for unreliable sources for some time and I don't see any effort to improve the article's sources... at this point readers cannot trust the article's neutrality. I will also try to add good sources along the way but that may take more time. Unfortunately there often are not good academic sources so we may be limited in what we can include. I think it's far better to have a shorter reliable article than a long one with dubious sources. Happy to discuss if objections come up. Gazelle55 (talk) 22:54, 1 November 2021 (UTC)