Talk:Emek Refaim

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

This article is a mess - and all the information has been moved to the German Colony page which I worked on extenstively just yesterday. There is no reason for all the duplication, plus this one is very badly written.--Gilabrand 07:39, 25 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Sure there are areas of duplication, but also areas of substantial difference around the mixed population history of the area.That is why it is also part of Palestinian history. I have striven for neutrality. Larryjhs 07:48, 25 July 2007 (UTC)larryjhsReply

So why work at cross-purposes? Put the information you think is missing into the German colony article, so we can make it better and more complete.--Gilabrand 08:10, 25 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

OK, I agree, give me some days. I am busy. Do you live in Jerusalem?Larryjhs 22:57, 25 July 2007 (UTC)larryjhsReply

A year has passed and nothing has been done about the duplication on this page, which includes the same information as on the German Colony page, but without proper citation. Something needs to be done.--Gilabrand (talk) 06:17, 12 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Emek Refaim. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:59, 23 December 2016 (UTC)Reply