Talk:Donald Forrester Brown

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Keith-264 in topic CE
Featured articleDonald Forrester Brown is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 8, 2018Good article nomineeListed
April 19, 2018WikiProject A-class reviewApproved
December 21, 2019Featured article candidateNot promoted
March 14, 2020Featured article candidatePromoted
Current status: Featured article

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Donald Forrester Brown. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:59, 12 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:Donald Forrester Brown/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Iazyges (talk · contribs) 08:20, 6 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Will start soon. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 08:20, 6 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Criteria edit

GA Criteria

GA Criteria:

  • 1
    1.a  Y
    1.b  Y
  • 2
    2.a  Y
    2.b  Y
    2.c  Y
    2.d  Y (There is one at 87.6%, but it appears obvious that this is a copy from Wikipedia, not vice versa.)
  • 3
    3.a  Y
    3.b  Y
  • 4
    4.a  Y
  • 5
    5.a  Y
  • 6
    6.a
    6.b
  • No DAB links  Y
  • No Dead links  Y

Prose Suggestions edit

  • Brown's Victoria Cross was the second won by a soldier serving with the suggest you change this to Brown's Victoria Cross was the second awarded to a soldier serving with the
  • , having been promoted to corporal. suggest , by this time promoted to corporal.
  • However, with Brown's death it was not until the officers of his battalion started agitating suggest However, with Brown's death it was not until the officers of his battalion started lobbying, unless the protest/effort was highly public.
  • Prefer agitating at this stage, I don't how public the officers efforts were. Zawed (talk) 09:07, 8 March 2018 (UTC)Reply
  • @Iazyges:, many thanks for the review, much appreciated. Cheers, Zawed (talk) 09:07, 8 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

CE edit

Cheeky little ce, auto-edded, homogenised isbns to 13s, a few typos, disamb Somme, checked for dups and dupe wikis. RV as desired. Keith-264 (talk) 20:07, 18 April 2018 (UTC)Reply