Untitled edit

This says "largest electoral district in the world." That's no doubt true in the way we normally think of things, but it's come to my attention that, for example, the Italian parliament has seats for Italian nationals living abroad, with the districts they represent encompassing entire continents. Do we reword or is this too nitpicky? - Montréalais 08:08, 10 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Is it true to say that this is the largest electorate in the world electing a single member to a legislative body? If you include multi-member electorates, then Western Australia in the Senate is bigger. Is Sakha in Russia and the Overseas electorate in the Italian Senate like this? --ThirdEdition 01:26, 20 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Still need an authoritative source for the two statements that DoK is largest and Nunavut (electoral district) is second. Otherwise, it's just "the largest that Wikipedia editors were able to find". Also see Talk:Kalgoorlie. --Mathew5000 16:28, 4 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

  • Well, it shouldn't be impossible to ascertain this. The Division of Kalgoorlie is larger than all but 12 countries in the world, one of which is Australia itself. We also know that the DoK is larger than Nunavut (Canada's largest constituency) and Alaska (the largest district in the United States House of Representatives). The Italian overseas constituency should probably be disqualified because it's not a single-member district. On the other hand, Sakha might be a single-member constituency; someone more familiar with Russian politics may be needed to help with this. --Metropolitan90 04:06, 8 October 2007 (UTC)Reply
Also, Kalgoorlie looks set to shrink to become fourth or fifth largest in Australia with a proposed O'Connor picking up most of its slack and becoming Australia's HoR's largest at a "mere" 1 587 759 km². Obviously this needs to be made official and even then I don't know whether the new boundaries take effect instantly in some sense or if they wait till the next election. —Felix the Cassowary 05:47, 5 August 2008 (UTC)Reply
Indeed. Even more curiously, it makes O'Connor, the safest Coalition seat in Western Australia, winnable for Labor. Orderinchaos 06:52, 5 August 2008 (UTC)Reply
Looks like Kalgoorlie will be abolished and replaced by Durack. Also redistributions take effect at general elections and by-elections, such as the Canberra by-election, 1995, occur on old boundaries, although it was popularly known as the Namadgi by-election.--Grahame (talk) 11:35, 13 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Division of Kalgoorlie. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:22, 14 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:22, 27 March 2019 (UTC)Reply