Talk:Densified coal
Latest comment: 6 months ago by Queen of Hearts in topic Proposed merge of Black coal equivalent into Densified coal
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Densified coal article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
 | The contents of the Coldry process page were merged into Densified coal on 23 March 2019. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
 |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Merge October 2017 edit
Coldry process substantially overlaps with this article and the essential content there could be usefully merged here. --Wtshymanski (talk) 23:18, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Proposed merge of Black coal equivalent into Densified coal edit
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Same process, same place (Australia), heck, same ECT developer! Artoria2e5 🌉 18:30, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Note: should redirect instead to refined coal. Artoria2e5 🌉 18:57, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
- Support. Either target seems fine, but perhaps refined coal is better. There's significant overlap between the 3. Klbrain (talk) 15:26, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.