Talk:David Lenz

My recent edits

I had to remove all those enormous, copyright-violating block quotes, which were non-encyclopedic anyway. While I was here, I also formatted the references in a much more useful manner. Glad to help a Milwaukee-area artistic topic. --Orange Mike | Talk 14:22, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you Orange Mike for your help. Obviously I am a new contributor to WP and I'm still learning the ropes. Maybe for my next project I'll start an article about the Outwin Boochever Portrait Competition. In the world of portraiture, this competition is a very big deal and should have an article on WP.Nuts4art (talk) 15:42, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks Mike. I had asked him to review the article because he is more versed in dealing with these issues. Royalbroil 14:06, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Rewrite and Expansion

I obtained a copy of the Charles Allis Catalog and it was filled with wonderful information about this artist. I decided to do a major rewrite and expansion of the article.Nuts4art (talk) 00:45, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

File:Rare Halo Display- Portrait of Eunice Kennedy Shriver.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Rare Halo Display- Portrait of Eunice Kennedy Shriver.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests September 2011 What should I do? Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 11:55, 10 September 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on David Lenz. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101127022100/http://www.jsonline.com:80/blogs/entertainment/110469404.html to http://www.jsonline.com/blogs/entertainment/110469404.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111007184858/http://www.wisconsinacademy.org/about/index.php?category_id=3592&subcategory_id=6564 to http://www.wisconsinacademy.org/about/index.php?category_id=3592&subcategory_id=6564

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:19, 8 December 2016 (UTC)