Talk:Curio maximus

Classical Greece and Rome Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Roman Republic#Early Republic|early Republic]] The anchor (#Early Republic) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Curio maximus and Quirinus edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

A very welcome and much informative contribution.

This article is important in relation to our knowledge of god Quirinus. Dumezil thought the Quirinalia were in fact the stultorum feriae, i.e. the last day of the Fornacalia. The curio m. decided about the date of these feriae.

The curiae on the other hand were the original social entities of the Roman people and Quirinus was their god. These social character constitues the essential theological meaning of this god: Quirinus is the god of the Romans as producers, farmers and members of a civil commonwealth. This is the only interpretation that can give an interpretation that makes sense and is grounded in the sources.

A question: was the rex sacrorum from the Marcii really a plebeian? Aldrasto11 (talk) 12:36, 25 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Add topic