Talk:Crispin Sartwell
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 9 September 2015. The result of the discussion was keep. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wikipedia reference edit
OMG he just plugged wikipedia on Washington Journal!!! --pile0nadestalk | contrib 4 July 2005 12:24 (UTC)
- omg lol 84.137.14.50
This isn't Myspace.com edit
"His daughter, Emma Sartwell, is trying too hard to look like Lola from Run Lola Run and Lilu from The Fifth Element. Her website, www.crispinsartwell.com/emmahome.htm, features her writing and artwork. At the moment, she is sitting in a dormroom in Chicago with painter Jason Benson and his hairstylist Elizabeth Weiss, editing her father's Wikipedia page."
You may consider this page your own, but this kind of comment in an article really is inappropriate and unprofessional. I'm new on Wikipedia, so I won't just edit it out; but I do expect that to be done (or at least some good reason to be given in the discussion for why it should stay).
- You're right, so I've removed that bit. Kevin 13:33, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
vanity edit
This is a vanity page. Wikipedia should have it removed (or at least heavily edited). Thanks. 64.9.57.5 16:01, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Just want to say I agree, surprised this page has not been deleted.Philosophy Junkie (talk) 23:59, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
WikiProject class rating edit
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 03:53, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
Hmm. edit
I haven't read anything by this guy, but how does the quotation "But calling these people terrorists when no evidence has been or has to be produced is idiotic." measure up to the obvious consequences of removing justification from the concept of truth?
Also, I hope the person this page concerns hasn't seen it, because that list of quotations is positively masturbatory. - Teeks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.200.143.32 (talk) 00:33, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
Proposed deletion edit
Not only do there not appear to be reliable sources, the subject is not notable. I am surprised this article lasted so long.Philosophy Junkie (talk) 01:18, 1 September 2015 (UTC)