Talk:Cluster 5

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Cluster 5 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL

COVID-19 Mid‑importance

	COVID-19 portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject COVID-19, a project to coordinate efforts to improve all COVID-19-related articles. If you would like to help, you are invited to join and to participate in project discussions.COVID-19Wikipedia:WikiProject COVID-19Template:WikiProject COVID-19COVID-19 articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Denmark Mid‑importance

	Denmark portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Denmark, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Denmark on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DenmarkWikipedia:WikiProject DenmarkTemplate:WikiProject DenmarkDenmark articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Medicine: Emergency / Society / Pulmonology Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Emergency medicine and EMS task force (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the Society and Medicine task force (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by the Pulmonology task force (assessed as High-importance).

Molecular Biology: Genetics Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Genetics task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Disaster management Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Viruses High‑importance

	Viruses portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Viruses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of viruses on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirusesWikipedia:WikiProject VirusesTemplate:WikiProject Virusesvirus articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Text and/or other creative content from this version of Cluster 5 was copied or moved into Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 variants with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Is "cluster 5" a scientific name for the mutated variant or a popular name? edit

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I'm no expert in this stuff, but as far as I've understood—through reading the wording from the SSI and WHO and about what a gene cluster is—I understand it as if naming the mutation only "cluster 5" is a not a scientific but popular thing; if anyone knows a lot about this stuff and that is the case, feel free to add the "popularly" in "Cluster 5" is the name given to a mutated variant ..." or something to that effect. —Biscuit-in-Chief :-) ^{(/tɔːk/ – /ˈkɒntɹɪbs/)} 09:34, 16 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

I'd say there is no need for a "popularly" label, since even if it's not a scientific name, it was officially used in the Danish government press release about the matter if I'm not mistaken. I do understand that whether it's official or scientific doesn't change whether or not we should use it on Wikipedia because of WP:CommonName, I'm just saying that given how it was used in official press releases, there's nothing "popular" about it that deserves a label or disclaimer. More scientific mutation names can be and are given later. LjL (talk) 19:19, 16 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

No category for strains? edit

Latest comment: 3 years ago7 comments2 people in discussion

There seems to be no category for all the countless strains of SARS-Cov-2. D614G is simply forwarded to the disease and not to the virus article and unmentioned here. --Manorainjan 19:30, 23 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Then make one. And change the redirect to SARS-CoV-2. If you do make a category, please call it something like "Variants of SARS-CoV-2", not "strains ...", as it is quite unclear what are variants and what are strains. In fact, you can apparently call it a "variant strain" (see WHO and CDC). Also, why should D614G be mentioned in this article? It isn't one of the defining changes of cluster 5, and isn't even mentioned in the SSI's short report on cluster 5. —Biscuit-in-Chief :-) ^{(/tɔːk/ – /ˈkɒntɹɪbs/)} 19:49, 23 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Regarding strain vs. variant, I found this: At a briefing organised by the UK’s Science Media Centre on Tuesday, Prof Tom Connor of the School of Biosciences at Cardiff University explained: “There is one strain of coronavirus. That is Sars-Cov-2. That is the single strain, and there are variants of that strain. These are variants.” Prof Connor said the term strain is often misused. “The correct term to use is variant to describe this particular variant of concern.”[1] With "coronavirus" I think it's reasonable to assume that he means "SARS-CoV-2". Might've changed the subject a bit there.

—Biscuit-in-Chief :-) ^{(/tɔːk/ – /ˈkɒntɹɪbs/)} 19:55, 23 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

(edit-conflict) Admittingly I would not be able to distinguish the difference between strain and variant myself, therefore I will not name a category. What I know is, that D614G is a single mutation and therefore only one part of the change from one variant or strain to the other. It means, the base pair #614 got changed from D to G. And there where several such mutations within one step. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y8eAFJwekSo --Manorainjan 20:02, 23 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

So, in that case it would be Category:SARS-CoV-2_Variants or not? --Manorainjan 20:04, 23 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

I'd say Category:Variants of SARS-CoV-2. —Biscuit-in-Chief :-) ^{(/tɔːk/ – /ˈkɒntɹɪbs/)} 20:07, 23 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

OK, done. --Manorainjan 20:23, 23 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Add topic