Talk:Clarence McGeary

Latest comment: 5 months ago by PrimalMustelid in topic Did you know nomination

Did you know nomination edit

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PrimalMustelid talk 16:56, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

5x expanded by BeanieFan11 (talk). Self-nominated at 15:00, 18 October 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Clarence McGeary; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.Reply

  • Reviewing.
General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
  • Cited:  
  • Interesting:  
QPQ: Done.
Overall:   Well done on the article; interesting hook! ~ Tails Wx 01:56, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Reply


GA Review edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:Clarence McGeary/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Gonzo fan2007 (talk · contribs) 21:34, 18 October 2023 (UTC)Reply


I'll review this one. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 21:34, 18 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):  
    b (citations to reliable sources):  
    c (OR):  
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):  
    b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  

Overall:
Pass/Fail:  

  ·   ·   ·  


Comments edit

  • to late to be eligible to the first "to" should be "too"
  • He returned to the Bison in 1948 and played end. He moved from end to center in the 1949 season. probably an opportunity to combine these two sentences to soften up the short, choppiness
  • Fargo, North Dakota need a comma after North Dakota
  • but choose to remain -> "chose"
  • Bismarck, North Dakota need a comma after North Dakota
  • Ref spot check: #4, 5, 11, 17, 21, 22

Looks good, putting on hold. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 16:22, 19 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.