Talk:Carolina (Taylor Swift song)
Latest comment: 5 months ago by Dano67 in topic unrelated / incorrect citation
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Carolina (Taylor Swift song) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | Carolina (Taylor Swift song) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: September 24, 2022. (Reviewed version). |
 | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wiki Education assignment: Honors English 250HV10 edit
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 29 August 2022 and 28 October 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Osterhc1 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Oliver1445, DreamMoonBlue.
— Assignment last updated by Fursheep98 (talk) 14:59, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
GA Review edit
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Carolina (Taylor Swift song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Dora the Axe-plorer (talk · contribs) 01:36, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Dora the Axe-plorer: Hi! Looking forward to work with you. Have a nice day. ℛonherry☘ 05:36, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
- Hello, thanks for dropping the message. I should give my initial comments in a day or two :) Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 05:58, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section):
b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- a (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Overall the article is looking really good. There was some minor lang issues that I have fixed. However I ran the article through Earwig's Copyvio Detector and it has a 85.5% similarity with this blog wiki. Upon first glance, this is a blog wiki so I could just ignore (right?) but I'll take more time to look into it. Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 04:42, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
- It appears to be a fan website..a blog but not much information about it. One stark difference is that the blog does not cite any sources and it definitely isn't a secondary source. Nothing is verifiable in that blog whereas the article I'm reviewing is well cited and verifiable. There are no other similarities beside that blog and I assume good faith that contributors to the article wrote in their own words (and that blog took a large part of the Wikipedia article) so I am going to pass the nomination. Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 04:59, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail:
removed from the "Writing" section: citation to an article of literary criticism on author Jonathan Swift. Proper citation for that sentence (on Swift's inspiration) needed.
-- Castle, Terry J. (2014-06-11), "Why the Houyhnhnms Don't Write: Swift, Satire and the Fear of the Text*", Jonathan Swift, Routledge, pp. 239–254, doi:10.4324/9781315843865-18, ISBN 978-1-315-84386-5, retrieved 2022-09-20{{citation}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link) Dano67 (talk) 05:34, 7 December 2023 (UTC)