Welcome! edit

 
Some cookies to welcome you!  

Welcome to Wikipedia, Dano67! Thank you for your contributions. I am BrillLyle and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! BrillLyle (talk) 22:48, 26 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Projects edit

Worked to improve the page on artist Jenny Holzer for Art+Feminism edit-athon 2016.

  • Ongoing: Improving culture- and media-related content on local (Ithaca, NY; Elmira-Corning NY), regional pages and on music topics.

Dano67 (talk) 17:27, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Created Teenage Tragedies (topic: compilation album) - April 8-9, 2016 Working on improvements, adding definition of the style and sources for Teenage tragedy songs - a very muddled article. Dano67 (talk) 01:30, 10 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Teenage Tragedies (April 8) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 21:11, 8 April 2016 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Dano67, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 21:11, 8 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Teenage Tragedies (April 9) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bradv was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Bradv 04:07, 9 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Teenage Tragedies has been accepted edit

 
Teenage Tragedies, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bradv 14:07, 9 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Teenage tragedy song edit

Thanks for your edits there. Do you mind if I join in? There is quite a lot more work needing to be done - as well as fleshing out the background some more, there are more good (or good/bad) examples that could be added, and I'm also keen to make sure that songwriters, as well as recording artists, are credited - perhaps by an additional column in the table. I've also amended a couple of your citations - see WP:REFNAME. If we are prepared to use blog sites in our searches, have you seen this site, and this one? Ghmyrtle (talk) 08:02, 16 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

User:Ghmyrtle: Actually, I did read those. The first one is rather lazy, compiling many suggestions that led his list down the same road to off-topic irrelevance as this wiki page's previous iteration. -- i.e. "I haven't heard this one but it seems to fit." It did include a few additional examples, however, that are in the wheelhouse. The other personal page has fewer examples, again without much depth, kind of a glancing view of the topic as a subset of a larger horror-themed site.

One article I quoted and sourced today (Kirsten Zemke's, developed after her podcast in 2011, also referenced) seemed to have a little more authoritative/scholarly heft, and she also has some sources of her own in it. (including that nyx.net - but I'm loathe to use that as a secondary source for reasons above.) All that said, more good (good/bad) examples welcome!

Agreed on songwriters (and that all the entries need to be sourced). I'm not a fan of the table as it is, but don't know much about reformatting to try another style of list.

Next steps for me might be breaking the lead section in two with, say, a 'History' or 'Historical context' subhead, moving more of parodies and 'later' songs off the examples table (50 seems like too too many there) to a section below, showing the themes of these 50s-60s songs carrying into later songs.

Thanks! Dano67 (talk) 08:21, 16 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

That's fine - I'll be hopping in and out of that article as I find sources, and find time to do some editing - hopefully we won't tread on each others' toes too much. Several of the songs in the table need to be taken out, as parodies, for one thing. Good work! Ghmyrtle (talk) 08:26, 16 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Oh, per the above 'next steps', I see you've already broken up the lead section based on my writing so far. Nicely done. Dano67 (talk) 08:41, 16 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

I'll do some work later this weekend on moving later/similar songs (I'm thinking of all those after 'Ode to Billie Jo') - into a text section, along with moving parodies out. Dano67 (talk) 16:25, 16 April 2016 (UTC) And of course, sourcing some that no one who previously added the content bothered to source. Thanks … Dano67 (talk) 16:22, 16 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

User:Ghmyrtle: More sourcing on my end to do, of course. Saw your addition of 'Clementine' to my new content. Thanks, that's perfect.Dano67 (talk) 09:32, 17 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

I may have some time in the coming week to look out additional offline sources - or, I may not...! Ghmyrtle (talk) 09:44, 17 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
PS: Re this edit, if you leave it with a WP:REDLINK, it's more likely that a new article will be created. Ghmyrtle (talk) 07:30, 18 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

User:Ghmyrtle: Re the songwriting credits - was there a main or single source for those, and could it be added to external sources? Or did you search hither and yon?

I'll be going through and adding citations for those I have flagged, and for the text I have added. And then flag some more, and repeat the process. Dano67 (talk) 16:01, 18 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

No, there wasn't a single source. I looked at label scans at Discogs.com and 45cat.com, and then checked against other sources - but didn't keep track of the details I'm afraid. Ghmyrtle (talk) 16:45, 18 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Bang Bang (My Baby Shot Me Down) edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Bang Bang (My Baby Shot Me Down) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carbrera -- Carbrera (talk) 23:20, 25 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Bang Bang (My Baby Shot Me Down) edit

The article Bang Bang (My Baby Shot Me Down) you nominated as a good article has failed  ; see Talk:Bang Bang (My Baby Shot Me Down) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carbrera -- Carbrera (talk) 23:41, 25 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Carbrera -- Thank you, I will review the review, and make further improvements. My work to date on this has mostly been on clarifying and improving the writing, adding musicological research sources, and weeding out extraneous or non-notable content, particularly in the cover versions section. More to come ... Dano67 (talk) 16:29, 26 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Teenage tragedy song edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Teenage tragedy song you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of David Eppstein -- David Eppstein (talk) 01:01, 5 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Teenage tragedy song edit

The article Teenage tragedy song you nominated as a good article has failed  ; see Talk:Teenage tragedy song for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of David Eppstein -- David Eppstein (talk) 02:01, 5 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit

Hello, Dano67. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message edit

Hello, Dano67. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for January 12 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Anna Coogan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page No Depression (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 12 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Women in Red's April+Further with Art+Feminism 2018 edit

 
Please join us as Women in Red and Art+Feminism continue our collaboration in April 2018. Continue the work you've done in March and pledge to help close the gender gap in April! All you need to do is sign up on the Meet-Up page below and list any articles you create in the month of April.
 


April+Further with Art+Feminism

To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list or Women in Red/international list. To unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list. Follow us on Twitter: @wikiwomeninred

August and New Achievements at Women in Red edit

Meetups #87, #88, #89, #90 edit

 
An exciting new month for Women in Red!


August 2018 worldwide online editathons:
New: Indigenous women Women of marginalized populations Women writers Geofocus: Bottom 10
Continuing: #1day1woman Global Initiative
Notable women, broadly-construed!



For the first time, this month we are trying out our Monthly achievement initiative

  • All creators of new biographies can keep track of their progress and earn virtual awards.
  • It can be used in conjunction with the above editathons or for any women's biography created in August.
  • Try it out when you create your first biography of the month.

Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!):

(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list)


--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:32, 19 July 2018 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit

Hello, Dano67. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit

Hello, Dano67. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Women in Red April Events edit

 
April 2019, Volume 5, Issue 4, Numbers 107, 108, 114, 115, 116, 117


Hello and welcome to the April events of Women in Red!

Please join us for these virtual events:


Other ways you can participate:


Subscription options: Opt-in (EN-WP) / Opt-in (international) / Unsubscribe

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 20:32, 22 March 2019 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for December 30 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rachel Sweet, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 3D. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 30 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

thanks, I will correct to 3D | (3D film). Dano67 (talk) 04:06, 5 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Borden press 2019.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Borden press 2019.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:05, 12 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for July 13 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Susanna Hoffs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richard Thompson.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 13 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

-- fixed. Dano67 (talk) 13:25, 21 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Susanna Hoffs article edit

Hi, you didn't include sources for the info that you added to the Susanna Hoffs article. Please could you add them? Otherwise those additions are liable to be removed. (See WP:BURDEN.) Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 23:54, 16 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

sure, my mistake - thank you for the notice. Dano67 (talk) 12:45, 18 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thanks, but please see WP:RSDISCOGS and WP:BLOGS. Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 14:40, 18 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
--- for now, discogs had the relevant compilation details mentioned in my addition. It is a user-generated source, but also user-edited and is corrected and updated for accuracy fairly diligently, much like Wikipedia. I add and update details on releases regularly there. (I will search for a review or a press release from the label, however.)
The blog citation was an interview with the artist in which she directly answers the origins of her pseudonym in Ming Tea, so it seemed the best, most relevant source from among the few times I have seen or heard her tell that story. Dano67 (talk) 13:33, 21 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for August 8 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Nervebreakers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AMC.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 8 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for September 7 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Deborah Allen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page EP.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 7 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for October 15 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Buckaroo (instrumental), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Danny Barnes.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 15 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply