Talk:COVID-19 pandemic in Chile
 | The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to COVID-19, broadly construed, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
 | This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
.svg){kind=small} | Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
 |
|
WikiProject COVID-19 edit
I've created WikiProject COVID-19 as a temporary or permanent WikiProject and invite editors to use this space for discussing ways to improve coverage of the ongoing 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic. Please bring your ideas to the project/talk page. Stay safe, --Another Believer (Talk) 17:57, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Can someone please update "Case summary" section edit
Can someone please update the section "Case summary" or just revert it to older format, which will be easy to read (Refer Spanish version page). --Naveen N Kadalaveni (talk) 16:19, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- Ignore, Updated that table by referring revision history --Naveen N Kadalaveni (talk) 16:48, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- Comment: It was updated with cumulative count instead of daily new cases count, data is incorrect for the specified template. Hence reverted it to old format, If you feel like using the below template then please update the new cases count for each region and then replace the existing table. --Naveen N Kadalaveni (talk)
- Done. Ok to make the switch? Emailsson (talk) 20:05, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- @ Emailsson Sure, Go ahead --Naveen N Kadalaveni (talk) 20:15, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- Done. Ok to make the switch? Emailsson (talk) 20:05, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- Comment: It was updated with cumulative count instead of daily new cases count, data is incorrect for the specified template. Hence reverted it to old format, If you feel like using the below template then please update the new cases count for each region and then replace the existing table. --Naveen N Kadalaveni (talk)
- Ignore, Updated that table by referring revision history --Naveen N Kadalaveni (talk) 16:48, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Mistake on Additional deaths edit
Number of 653 additional deaths is incorrect. 553 additional deaths is the correct amount.
--PetrixImmanol (talk) 15:54, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Covid-19 recoveries edit
Chile has 186,441 recoveries [1][2] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.232.51.215 (talk) 15:48, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
Request for comment - cases change metrics edit
Please take part in discussion here: Project COVID-19, Medical cases charts - change type — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kohraa Mondel (talk • contribs) 23:09, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
Active cases edit
Hi, I looked into here and the Ministry of Health has a graphic of the active cases that looks different to the one in the articles, specially in June when, remember, they made some changes to the way they counted them. Should we change the information in the graphics of the article to show this information? I think we should as our graphic of the active cases is based on daily reports and looks very unnatural (again, specially in June), and the information provided by the Ministry in the link takes into account other factors to update the past daily cases, giving a more realistic approach to the real number of cases. Best regards, James2813 (talk) 19:49, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- I'm not sure if it is correct to change the data currently. Most of the data is based on the daily reports; the only exceptions are the deaths and the vaccination progress, considering in both cases the government has mentioned they are updating actively the numbers (vaccination data is uploaded almost immediately, while deaths have a delay by default given the certificates take a few days to be made). In the case of active and recovered, the numbers are counted using the daily reports and the definition of active and recovered did change -in fact, there was a lot of criticism to that change-. I'm not sure if we should update that data because a) it reflects the change of criteria, and b) then we will have to update all data to the current number. --B1mbo (talk) 02:25, 19 February 2021 (UTC)