Talk:CONCACAF

Fair use rationale for Image:Concacaf logo.png

Image:Concacaf logo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:53, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

U17 Womens

Is there no page for the U17 Concacaf Womens event? Maybe I'll get one started when I have some time. --Coppercanuck (talk) 01:04, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Women's teams

I see no good reason why the "National teams""Member nations" section should link to one sex only. I'd like to encourage suggestions of how to improve it.

Separate lists of men's and women's teams might be OK, but feels clumsy.

I tried messing with template Ft but couldn't get the none flag param to work. My thought would be to provide links like "United States (men - women)".

Replacing links with links to nations seems like a last resort; I think there's a strong case for linking to national teams as is the status quo (only, to women's as well as men's teams).

Perhaps some table or something I've not thought of would be most appropriate.

Eager to hear ideas -- Regards, PhilipR (talk) 19:53, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

Maybe you could try to use a table similar to the one used in the CONMEBOL article. Regards --Bocafan76 (talk) 20:13, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

The spanish article has the country, the federation and both national teams pages (when available). Maybe that format should be the one we use. --140.212.162.80 (talk) 20:10, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

Zona centroamericana (UNCAF)

País	Federación	Selecciones
Belize	Football Federation of Belize	masculina femenina
Costa Rica	Federación Costarricense de Fútbol (Fedefut)	masculina femenina
El Salvador	Federación Salvadoreña de Fútbol(Fesfut)	masculina femenina
Guatemala	Federación Nacional de Fútbol de Guatemala	masculina femenina
Honduras	Federación Nacional Autónoma de Fútbol de Honduras (Fenafuth)	masculina femenina
Nicaragua	Federación Nicaragüense de Fútbol (Fenifut)	masculina femenina
Panama	Federación Panameña de Fútbol (Fepafut)	masculina

This is the format I think we should use here (in English of course) Ceezmad (talk) 18:18, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

Relative size of confederation

The opening sentence of the third paragraph states that CONCACAF is the second-smallest football confederation, yet CONMEBOL has 10 member nations and OFC has 11 member nations. This would make CONCACAF no smaller than third-smallest if one considers only member nations. What is the context for referring to CONCACAF as the second-smallest confederation? -- Jkudlick (talk) 23:22, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

• Correction made to said paragraph. -- Jkudlick ^tc_s 15:10, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Club rankings

I understand that since IFFHS have not updated their club rankings since June 4 that another source was preferable, so a table using Football Database data was added. However, I am somewhat troubled by the inclusion of a table from a source whose ranking formula is not explained on their site – IFFHS explain their formula, which lends credence and the ability for an outside party to verify the results. I'd like to open a discussion to determine possible alternatives to both of these sources. -- Jkudlick ^tc_s 15:17, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Yeah, I removed those now. There was already another on from another site. Maybe could be uses as an exxternal link but a whole loist in the article gives them too much importance. The have no connection to CONCACAF at all. -Koppapa (talk) 07:03, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

Section for execs

Should we include a section to talk about CONCACAF's executives? For example, past presidents, historical accounts like the corruption scandals, and other information that might be useful? 68.119.88.7 (talk) 11:59, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

I'm removing the Portuguese name from the lead

Apart from Brazil, which is not a CONCACAF country but rather a CONMEBOL country, no other country or dependency in the Americas has Portuguese as an official language. There's no indication that Portuguese is an official language of the Confederation either. I'm therefore removing the Portuguese name from the lead. --Theurgist (talk) 23:54, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on CONCACAF. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120720005131/http://www.concacaf.com:80/page/ConfederationDetail/0,,12813~2848973,00.html to http://www.concacaf.com/page/ConfederationDetail/0,,12813~2848973,00.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.goal.com/en-us/news/67/world-cup/2010/07/07/2013961/world-cup-2010-netherlands-perfect-winning-streak-can-match
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.castrolfootball.com/legends/tournament/index.php?year=1970
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.copa2014.gov.br/en/torcedor/historia-das-copas/1970
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080913232659/http://www.fifa.com/worldcup/archive/edition=32/overview.html to http://www.fifa.com/worldcup/archive/edition=32/overview.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:31, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

Table width

The width of some tables is making sections of this article unreadable. I don't know nearly enough about this to fix it. Anyone? Thanks. Jessicapierce (talk) 19:24, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

I think the tables should be surrounded with some variation of: <div style="overflow:auto;"> </div> I tried but couldn't get it quite right. BLAIXX 17:30, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

Our country

I want our environment clean as a community we need to take care our environment 41.115.70.19 (talk) 16:39, 4 December 2022 (UTC)