Talk:Brush
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Brush article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1 |
 | This  level-4 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unsourced edit
The article is start quality in terms of length, but there are no references.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 23:59, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
time to split? edit
I think it's time to split "paintbrush" out from the general "brush" article. There are many specialty kinds of paintbrushes and more detail that can be gone into. -- phoebe / (talk to me) 00:21, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
Agree Editor8778 (talk) 13:59, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
potential sources edit
- The Artist's Handbook of Materials and Techniques, Mayer
- The Painter's Handbook: A Complete Reference, Gottsegen
The history section is ridiculous edit
Referenceless "branches used to sweep" which is a broom I believe. Then something about a factory in NY. Well people were making brushes in shops in the US long before the mid nineteenth. So the factory reference really tells more about social and industrial organizational development than anything having to do with a brush. It's obvious that someone recognized the need for a history section but then simply didn't do the work. 162.154.248.143 (talk) 13:37, 12 July 2023 (UTC)