 |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=icon}
Contested deletion edit
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because Bricklink, formerly Bricklink LLC and now Lego® Bricklink is a commercial platform with thousands of daily users. While the argument can be made that due to Bricklink as of 2018 being solely child of The Lego Group, it should not have an independent article however as per the agreements of conditions of purchase, Bricklink receives a certain degree of autonomy hence it being still labeled by many as an independent platform.
- Hello @EVaDiSh, Wikipedia looks to the notability, verifiability, and contains no original research. However, popularity is not same as notability or verifiability, and a purchased company not always requires to be mentioned or creating an article; if it doesn't meet those criterias. Ahmetlii (talk) 18:46, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
- Comment: Only one of the sources (bloomberg) is an independent, reliable source. Sungodtemple a tcg fan!!1!11!! (talk) 18:47, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
- The redirect doesn't explain what Bricklink is, however, and is in that regard not particularly helpful. 惑乱 Wakuran (talk) 16:59, 19 June 2022 (UTC)