This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Agriculture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of agriculture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AgricultureWikipedia:WikiProject AgricultureTemplate:WikiProject AgricultureAgriculture articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This article is less than a week old, and still developing rapidly. It does cite several sources, which is great, but the sources only describe the qualities of individual feed ingredients. There are no sources, as far as I can see, that establish the notability of botanical additives as a class of food additives, nor verify the (albeit not particularly controversial) general information about the five types of additives described here or about botanical additives generally. I hesitate to add a maintenance tag asking for reference improvement on a start-class article that already cites more than a dozen sources, but some more general sourcing is needed. See WP:SYNTH. Cnilep (talk) 01:16, 10 December 2013 (UTC)Reply
