Talk:Bonaparte Visiting the Plague Victims of Jaffa

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Arminden in topic Almost no footnotes; implausible comments

Caps for title edit

It seems to me that since the page name is the actual title of the painting, it should be capitalised according to Engilsh usage in titles: Bonaparte Visiting the Plague Victims of Jaffa. However, not being very techno-savvy I was intimidated by what I encountered when I tried to do it, so I'm limiting myself to suggesting it here. Awien (talk) 22:41, 17 April 2008 (UTC)Reply


The page fails to mention the word ‘Neoclassicism’ once; given that the painting and Jean-Gros himself helped define the Neoclassicism period, it is a mistake to omit such germane information. Bakebakes (talk) 16:57, 18 September 2020 (UTC)User: BakebakesReply

There is a lack of citations in the article as well as missing information about the background of the painting and its discussion. Bceagle2121 (talk) 14:48, 22 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

It would be helpful to include more on the similarities between this painting and the Oath instead of just mentioning how they have similar compositions. jamesbutler2021 (talk) 19:42, 22 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Almost no footnotes; implausible comments edit

Almost the entire material is from 2008 and comes from Neddyseagoon, who has stopped editing since 2017. He indicated only one actual source in the bibliography part, Jean Massin's Almanach du Premier Empire: du Neuf-Thermidor à Waterloo, Volume 36 of Portraits de l'histoire, Club français du livre, 1988 (which, btw, is weird, since Massin died in 1886). Different times. By now we need footnotes to accept the material. A clear indication that it's outdated and not very reliable: it presents the visit and the touching of the sick as history, which most certainly it was not. Also, mistaking the ornate Orientalist background for the actual Armenian monastery and poor old Jaffa of 1799 is a joke. The article needs thorough reworking, is compromised for now. Arminden (talk) 05:09, 13 February 2021 (UTC)Reply