Talk:Black Forest Games

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Mario vs. Donkey Kong (5 participants)
Wired (demoparty) (1 participant)
Rewired (demoparty) (0 participants)
Grossology (books) (5 participants)
Studio Yotta (1 participant)
Vicious Engine (3 participants)
Jack Marston (Red Dead) (8 participants)
Joshua Tomar (6 participants)
Juhani (Star Wars) (3 participants; relisted)
Starwing Paradox (3 participants; relisted)
Pit (Kid Icarus) (13 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Featured content candidates

Good article nominations

Squirtle (nom)
Slowpoke (Pokémon) (start)
Rayman (video game) (nom)
Setzer Gabbiani (start)
Game Boy Color (start)
Talim (Soulcalibur) (start)
Fusajiro Yamauchi (start)
Mr. Mime (start)
Sonic Triple Trouble 16-Bit (nom)
Klefki (nom)
Sobble (start)
Exdeath (start)
Lucky Luna (nom)
Age of Empires: The Rise of Rome (start)
Mega Man X6 (nom)
Pikachu (nom)
Reigns (video game) (start)
Fallout Online (start)
Donkey Kong (start)
Horizon Forbidden West (start)
Surround (video game) (start)
AirCars (start)
Laura Matsuda (start)
SHODAN (nom)

DYK nominations

Reviews and reassessments

The Legend of Zelda: Majora's Mask (nom)
Hogwarts Legacy (rev)
Pokémon Channel (nom)
Rain World (rev)
Noctule (band) (rev)
Mario Kart: Double Dash (nom)

Articles that need...

I think the notability template should be removed edit

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

When the notability template was created ten years ago, the article only featured two, not independent sources: A Kickstarter page and the website of a product of the company. Now there are multiple references to reliable news sites (polygon.com, golem.de, gamereactor.eu) directly discussing the company's history.

Those sources are reliable, secondary, and independent of the topic and justify the removal of the template. SilentGameWriter (talk) 20:55, 31 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Done Friendlyhistorian (talk) 14:09, 8 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic