Meaning of 'Badatz' edit
Hi Shira, unfortunately your initial version of this article was completely wrong. While it is true that generally speaking, when people mention 'the Badatz', they are talking about the Badatz of the Edah HaChareidis - this does not mean that 'Badatz' exclusively refers to the Edah HaChareidis. In fact, any beit/s din in the world can call itself 'Badatz'. Thus, I have had to completely rewrite the article. Please do some more research before you place new articles. I'd honestly expect better work from an administrator. --89.139.15.109 22:38, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
- Your familiarity with administrators indicates you must be a Wikipedia regular, is there any particular reason you choose to scourge your fellow editors hidden behind an anonymous ip? --MPerel 23:22, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
- Is that in any way relevant to the subject? Because I choose to be editing from an IP, you will of course revert my -correct- edits back to a version which was plain nonsense. The remark I am making is that from a so-called 'Orthodox' Jewish administrator I would expect slightly more knowledge. --169.132.18.249 08:27, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
- You did not answer my question. --MPerel 08:59, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
- I answered your question with a question in return: why is that relevant? Does it in any way change the validity of what I wrote? --169.132.18.249 09:26, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
- Your question skirted answering my question which you still have not adequately answered. But I'll answer yours. Your uncivil and condescending behavior toward another editor is relevant to the editing environment, yes. Hiding behind anonymous ips to carry out such insulting behavior is particularly unimpressive and unhelpful. Whether or not your edits are valid is not the problem being addressed here. Do you have a regular Wikipedia account? --MPerel 10:07, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
- He did have a regular account, several in fact, but they are all banned from editing. If you still have any doubts, you can check his contributions to Avi's and also my own user page. You'll then have one guess as to which banned user he is. Yossiea (talk) 14:48, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
- Ah, I see. Well it's a shame, he seems somewhat knowledgeable, but just unable to play with others. What good is the knowledge without the latter? --MPerel 03:39, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
- He did have a regular account, several in fact, but they are all banned from editing. If you still have any doubts, you can check his contributions to Avi's and also my own user page. You'll then have one guess as to which banned user he is. Yossiea (talk) 14:48, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
- Your question skirted answering my question which you still have not adequately answered. But I'll answer yours. Your uncivil and condescending behavior toward another editor is relevant to the editing environment, yes. Hiding behind anonymous ips to carry out such insulting behavior is particularly unimpressive and unhelpful. Whether or not your edits are valid is not the problem being addressed here. Do you have a regular Wikipedia account? --MPerel 10:07, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
- I answered your question with a question in return: why is that relevant? Does it in any way change the validity of what I wrote? --169.132.18.249 09:26, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
- You did not answer my question. --MPerel 08:59, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
- Is that in any way relevant to the subject? Because I choose to be editing from an IP, you will of course revert my -correct- edits back to a version which was plain nonsense. The remark I am making is that from a so-called 'Orthodox' Jewish administrator I would expect slightly more knowledge. --169.132.18.249 08:27, 9 November 2007 (UTC)