Talk:BMX XXX

Latest comment: 1 year ago by SL93 in topic Did you know nomination

Nudity in mainstream games edit

"At the time of BMX XXX's release, sexual humor and nudity were not widely explored themes in mainstream video games" They were. Think of the Leisure Suit Larry series for example. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.253.186.82 (talk) 05:56, 18 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Denied classification in Australia? edit

I don't know if the game was modified and re-released, but I've seen it for sales in shops in Australia... -Nova Prime 11:47, 8 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on BMX XXX. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:34, 8 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Source edit

GA Review edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:BMX XXX/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Lee Vilenski (talk · contribs) 21:24, 16 October 2022 (UTC)Reply


Hello, I am planning on reviewing this article for GA Status, over the next couple of days. Thank you for nominating the article for GA status. I hope I will learn some new information, and that my feedback is helpful.

If nominators or editors could refrain from updating the particular section that I am updating until it is complete, I would appreciate it to remove a edit conflict. Please address concerns in the section that has been completed above (If I've raised concerns up to references, feel free to comment on things like the lede.)

I generally provide an overview of things I read through the article on a first glance. Then do a thorough sweep of the article after the feedback is addressed. After this, I will present the pass/failure. I may use strikethrough tags when concerns are met. Even if something is obvious why my concern is met, please leave a message as courtesy.

Best of luck! you can also use the {{done}} tag to state when something is addressed. Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs)

Please let me know after the review is done, if you were happy with the review! Obviously this is regarding the article's quality, however, I want to be happy and civil to all, so let me know if I have done a good job, regardless of the article's outcome.

Links edit

Prose edit

Lede edit

  • based in the stripclub Scores. - what? Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 07:58, 20 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • expanded technology and features, - this is almost always true (non-defining), so sounds a bit puffy. Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 07:58, 20 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • Despite an aggressive marketing campaign, the game's distribution was impeded by the refusal of major retailers to stock the title, Sony Computer Entertainment's refusal to publish the PlayStation 2 version unless the topless female nudity was censored, and an initial ban in Australia - this could probably be better as two sentences. Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 07:58, 20 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

General edit

  • name, sex - I'd use "gender" rather than sex as we are talking about a game using sex to sell. Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 08:13, 20 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • Any ideas if we have a glossary for something like "D-pad"? Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 08:13, 20 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • from the stripclub Scores - im assuming "Scores" is the name of the stripclub? I don't think that comes across in prose. Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 08:13, 20 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • unenthused if not angered - "dismayed" might be better. Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 08:13, 20 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • In September 2002, a rumor circulated that Sony Computer Entertainment would not approve the PlayStation 2 version of the game unless certain sexual content was removed. - I'm not sure this sentence is development, maybe in the release section. Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 08:13, 20 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • At some point we need to define that "PS2" is the PlayStation 2. Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 08:13, 20 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • of features.[33][42][45][49] - WP:OVERCITE, Could we bundle or remove a cite? Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 08:13, 20 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
Five cites is usually my threshold for bundling, but sure, I'm willing to move that down a notch. Cat's Tuxedo (talk) 18:08, 20 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
All above points have been addressed. Cat's Tuxedo (talk) 18:08, 20 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Review meta comments edit

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination edit

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 02:16, 5 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Improved to Good Article status by Cat's Tuxedo (talk). Self-nominated at 19:55, 20 October 2022 (UTC).Reply

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
  • Cited:  
  • Interesting:  
QPQ: Done.
Overall:   @Cat's Tuxedo: Good article! Hook is interesting, QPQ is done, and the article is a good article.   Approving. Onegreatjoke (talk) 20:53, 20 October 2022 (UTC)Reply