Talk:Avia S-199

Untitled

Why would you revert the edits I made on Aug. 20? I've studied the aircraft and interviewed the pilots who flew it for ten years.

---

That warehouse fire... was it the one that caused the Ústí massacre? --- Sandius 13:58, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:The First Fighter Squadron.gif

The image Image:The First Fighter Squadron.gif is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
• That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --09:07, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Jumo 211 being heavier than DB-605 is not correct

This is common mistake which is also on the CZ military museum web pages, etc. See specification of Daimler-Benz_DB_605 and Junkers_Jumo_211. Propeller was heavier and not appropriate for a fighter but needed for the engine with such performance intended for bomber use. Handling problems are confirmed by pilots. Balooo(cz) (talk) 08:29, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Main photo

Since the aircraft was produced is Czechoslovakia, it might be better to use the photo of the Avia S-199 with Czechoslovakia markings over the Avia S-199 with IDF markings.Articseahorse (talk) 00:14, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

A Bf109 derivative?

Which version? The specs in the article make it sound like a 109E or possibly a 109F. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.40.38.241 (talk)

The article states that the S-99 was a Bf 109G-6 built after the war by Avia, and that the S-199 was the S-99 with a different engine. Was that what you were asking? - BilCat (talk) 00:59, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Avia S-199/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Pretty good, I'm not sure how much more could be added, though the article could expand on the usage of the S-199 and S-99 in the Czech air force. M Van Houten 18:19, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Last edited at 01:52, 15 February 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 08:42, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Avia S-199. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110715000532/http://www.vhu.cz:80/cs/stranka/letecke-muzeum/fotogalerie-kbely4 to http://www.vhu.cz/cs/stranka/letecke-muzeum/fotogalerie-kbely4

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:06, 22 October 2016 (UTC)