I was asked to evaluate the translation from Romanian. It's pretty accurate. I did some cleanup and made some of the English more colloquial. - Jmabel | Talk 02:24, 2 June 2017 (UTC)Reply
Lots of red links to artists and institutions that deserve articles. - Jmabel | Talk 02:25, 2 June 2017 (UTC)Reply
@Onel5969: While we should doubtless have more than one source, you appear to object to Institutul National al Patrimoniului (cIMeC) as unreliable and overly primary. It does not seem to me objectionable on either of those grounds. Can you explain the basis of your issue? - Jmabel | Talk 02:32, 2 June 2017 (UTC)Reply
- Not sure why you're confused Jmabel, it's pretty clear cut. Read WP:PRIMARY. Here we have an ENTIRE article based on a single primary source. While the use of that primary source is not an issue, the sole reliance on that source is problematic. If that were the only source available, the article would most likely not pass an AfD discussion. Onel5969 TT me 12:21, 2 June 2017 (UTC)Reply
- I would consider twork of a professional at Institutul National al Patrimoniului to be secondary, not primary, and I certainly would not see any reason to question its reliability. And if the issue is {{One source}}, then say so, instead of {{unreliable sources}}, which is a different matter entirely. - Jmabel | Talk 15:13, 2 June 2017 (UTC)Reply
