Talk:Antonio Gherardi

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Italy Low‑importance

	Italy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sculpture

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sculpture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sculpture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SculptureWikipedia:WikiProject SculptureTemplate:WikiProject Sculpturesculpture articles

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment edit

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 27 August 2019 and 12 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Amandaaliz. Peer reviewers: Masonbissada, Sophiiquee.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 14:30, 16 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Peer Review - Mason Bissada edit

Lead edit

I do feel satisfied that I know the importance of Gherardi, but I think you could include some of his most famous works in the first paragraph of the lead (maybe even the first or second sentence). Nothing seems to be missing or redundant.

Structure edit

It appears you haven't yet broken the article up into sections yet, but I can see that you have a "history" or "early life" section ready to go. All you need to do is make the headers. Maybe you could add a section on the reception of his works? Nothing seems to be unnecessary or off-topic and the article is clearly written.

Balance/Neutrality edit

I think the phrase "extraordinarily inventive" could come off as a bit biased or subjective. Other than that, the article does not jump to conclusions or lean in one direction or opinion. It feels very neutral and historical.

Sourcing edit

This is the portion that needs the most work. I see a ton of links to other wiki pages (which is great) but I don't see any source list other than the exhibition and web gallery links. Make sure to source everything! Dates, facts etc.

Overall edit

The article does a good job of explaining who the artist is and what works he has created. The lead is very concise and summarizes the artist efficiently. Your biggest needs are sources and sections. I plan on linking to a ton of other wiki pages like you did. I love falling down wiki rabbit holes.

Peer Review - Sophie Liang edit

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Lead: I feel satisfied that I know the importance of the topic. I think it would be better to include a life and career or background section before listing his work. Nothing else seems to be missing.

Structure: More sections can be added to do a break down of the topic. You can add talk a little bit about the history and how his work has made an impact in today's society. Other than that, everything seems to be clearly written.

Balance/Neutrality: I agree with Mason. I think "extraordinarily inventive" can be seen as biased. Everything else seems balanced and neutral.

Sources: The article needs sourcing and citation.

Overall: The article does a very good job introducing the topic and his work. It is clearly written and written from a neutral point of view. The biggest and most important thing that needs work is the sourcing. I plan to add an "external links" section to my topic.

Sophiiquee (talk) 03:34, 7 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Add topic