Good articleAntonio Berni has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 26, 2013Good article nomineeListed
On this day...Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on October 13, 2018, and October 13, 2021.

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:Antonio Berni/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs) 10:23, 2 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

  • I propose to take on this review. My first impression is of a well-written, well-organised article. I will start a detailed review soon. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:23, 2 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

First reading edit

  • The lead section is rather short. It should summarise what is found in the body of the text.
  • It is not necessary to cite facts in the lead paragraph because they should be cited where they appear later in the article. Thus your reference #1 should appear in paragraph 1 of "Early life" and not in the lead.
  • "From 1951 to 1953 Berni lived in Santiago del Estero, a province in northwestern Argentina. The province was suffering massive ecological damage, including the exploitation of quebracho trees. While in Santiago del Estero he painted the series Motivos santiagueños and Chaco, the latter of which was exhibited in Paris, Berlin, Warsaw, Bucharest and Moscow." - I am not sure why the second sentence of this paragraph is included. Do the paintings mentioned in the third sentence (for which you have not provided English translations) illustrate ecological degradation?
  • "After a March 1976 coup Berni moved to New York City" - This sentence makes it seem that Berni had made a coup.
  • "His New York paintings display a great protagonism of color" - what does "protagonism" mean in this context?
  • Most of the prose is of high quality. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:51, 3 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

No response edit

There has been no response from the nominator who I see has made no edits on Wikipedia for the past fortnight. I will leave a note on his talk page which may bring a response when he returns. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:21, 9 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Image copyright edit

I was considering passing this article as a GA notwithstanding what I have written above because, although there has been no response to my comments, in general I feel it is well written and meets the GA criteria. However I now see that the main image has dubious copyright status so I will wait for one further week before making a decision. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:41, 18 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

  • Still no response from nominator. I find the image I was querying is used in 10 foreign language Wikipedias So I have decided its use is probably permissible. I moved the citation mentioned above and I think all other GA criteria are met. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:13, 26 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Antonio Berni. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:46, 15 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. Community Tech bot (talk) 13:52, 17 July 2018 (UTC)Reply