- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. This tennis player was found to not be the primary topic. (closed by non-admin page mover) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 00:59, 10 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
– no WP:PRIMARYTOPIC; [1] Joeykai (talk) 04:23, 2 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
- Support per nomination. There are 15 women listed upon the Anne Smith (disambiguation) page, to say nothing of the fact that there are six women and five women listed upon the (frequently combined Ann / Anne / Anna / Annie) Anna Smith and Annie Smith disambiguation pages, respectively. The seven-sentence (plus lengthy statistics) entry for the 1980s tennis player does not appear to delineate a champion of such renown as to surpass the combined notability of the other 26 women or even that of the 14 other women listed only at "Anne Smith". —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 00:26, 3 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
- Support per nom. No clear primary topic for this name. The safest bet is to just have the disambiguation page at the basename. Paintspot Infez (talk) 01:34, 3 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
- Weak support the tennis player gets the most views but not overwhelmingly more. Crouch, Swale (talk) 08:06, 3 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
- Support no primary topic here. Also worth mentioning that there's an Anna Smith (tennis) too, so there will need to be a hatnote here regardless of the outcome of this RM. Iffy★Chat -- 11:18, 3 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
- Support. No real primary topic here. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:23, 6 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
_(cropped).jpg)
