This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FeminismWikipedia:WikiProject FeminismTemplate:WikiProject FeminismFeminism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
A fact from Angel Island (novel) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 9 October 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that Inez Haynes Gillmore's 1914 science fiction novel Angel Island has been called a "classic of early feminist literature"?
Latest comment: 13 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion
I assessed this article as C class, because I expect some more sections on world information, including a publication history/background and some exploration of themes and style as separate from the criticism. Hope this helps, cheers!Sadads (talk) 14:58, 30 September 2010 (UTC)Reply
Also, the plot and character sections could use a little more work, checking for both style and clarity. Sadads (talk) 15:01, 30 September 2010 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the assessment. Adding additional sections might be a problem because there's not that much more information available that I can find. But I'll have a look, and I'll also look at the plot and character sections. —Bruce1eetalk 06:40, 1 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
You even note some style things in the Critical review section, such as the choice of characters being un-feminist. Even expanding upon that with an intention would be fine. Something I have notice about character and plot sections is that they always seem to have much the same information. I always recommend, when I am doing GA reviews that the characters be integrated into the plot section, unless of course their are an obtuse number of important characters or their is significant scholarship on the characters themselves,Sadads (talk) 07:17, 1 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the advise. I'll have a look at expanding it. —Bruce1eetalk 09:17, 1 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
.jpg){kind=small}
