This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Israel, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Israel on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IsraelWikipedia:WikiProject IsraelTemplate:WikiProject IsraelIsrael-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
OR on the part of editors is a Wiki-no-no; soap is also a no-no. Comments from editors should concern edits only, not editors. That being clearly understood, I must note that there are only about 6 hours difference between this edit[1], which constitutes the removal of referenced (but poorly melded) material, and this edit[2], which birthed the current article. While I am not genetically attached to either, but am an old fart (appropriate link not available in American English) and pov'd to one, I make the following observation for the general good of Wikipedia and all pov's:
POV'd circumspection seems more advantageous to NPOV in the long run, than pov'd circumscription in the short term.
Other follow-ons regarding these edits will appear on the appropriate page, per policy. Regards, CasualObserver'48 (talk) 14:18, 15 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
Could not find claims with laundering money. Removing n a lot of POV. Mashkin (talk) 10:32, 16 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The AIPAC article says that the "American Zionist Committee for Public Affairs" led to formation of AIPAC. I think the truth is a little more complicated than that See this article, but don't have time to research now in case someone else wants to. CarolMooreDC (talk) 19:35, 26 July 2009 (UTC)Reply
