Talk:Africana womanism

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 20 August 2020 and 4 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Bmsloanbarbour. Peer reviewers: Tsupatterson.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 13:34, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Wikify

This article does not follow the formatting and lay-out set out in Wikipedia's formatting guidelines. Please do not remove the wikify banner until the formatting has been corrected. Toby32225 (talk) 19:50, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

POV

This article is written as an Apologia! There must be a neutral and balanced depiction of the subject. The Ogre (talk) 13:02, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Reference citations unclear

It is not clear which book the "Hudson-Weems" citations refer to. The publication year or book title should be included in the citations so that it is not ambiguous. See how it is done at Emma Goldman for example. Kaldari (talk) 15:54, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV

I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:

This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:

1. There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
2. It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
3. In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 02:39, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Africana womanism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110717100448/http://tri-statedefenderonline.com/articlelive/articles/5584/1/Africana-Womanism-An-authentic-agenda-for-women-of-Africana-descent/Page1.html to http://tri-statedefenderonline.com/articlelive/articles/5584/1/Africana-Womanism-An-authentic-agenda-for-women-of-Africana-descent/Page1.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:11, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

Serious POV issues

This article is pure apologia.

(Aside from numerous other issues: Formatting, length, references, the fact that it reads like something a 2nd year critical theory student, hopped up on ritalin, threw together in one night.)

What do other feminists say about it? We don't know.

Would a Marxist say that Africana Womanism is the bastard child of intersectional theory and bourgeois intellectual snobbery, that completely ignores issues of class, in favor of racialist pseudo intellectual garbage? Probably, but apparently no criticism has ever been put forward of African Womanism, according to this article.

What do actual African women say about it? That would be a logical question, considering that the article exclusively mentions North American intellectuals/activists. But again, we have no idea after spending the 30-40 minutes it takes to soldier through this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.38.143.54 (talk) 21:09, 3 November 2018 (UTC)