Talk:Administrative scrivener
Latest comment: 8 years ago by Jytdog in topic article title
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Administrative scrivener article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
article title edit
 | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. The reviewer would like to request the editor with a COI attempt to discuss with editors engaged in the subject-area first. |
Regarding the page title, 'Certified Administrative Procedures Legal Specialist' would be more appropriate than 'Administrative scrivener' because the Japanese government translates Gyosei-shoshi Act as Certified Administrative Procedures Legal Specialist Act. Gyoseishoshi Lawyers of Tokyo website calls Gyosei-shoshi as Certified Administrative Procedures Legal Specialists as well.
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=2109&vm=04&re=02
http://tokyo-gyosei.or.jp/en/index.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Travelwriter888 (talk • contribs) 21:13, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
- I listed this at WP:Japan so others more skilled might comment. this site seems to provide a good history of the term and its translation and what you suggest might be OK. Seems to me that simply "Gyoseishoshi Lawyer" might be best. For now I am marking your COI request "answered". Jytdog (talk) 03:47, 5 January 2016 (UTC)