Talk:2008 Pacific Life Open – Men's singles

Tennis Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tennis, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that relate to tennis on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TennisWikipedia:WikiProject TennisTemplate:WikiProject Tennistennis articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tennis To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Cleanup : Take an item off the Cleanup listing
Copyedit : Roger Federer, Leander Paes, Rafael Nadal, Justine Henin – to be used as examples for ideal page structures
Expand : Grab a Start article and expand it, or peruse the List of articles.
Photo : Add photos to Tennis or Tennis people articles
Stubs : Bring a Stub up to our standards.
Other : *Sign up as a member of the project.
Tag more articles with our standard project template.
Help with the creation of yearly main articles and drawsheets for every Open Era ATP and WTA tournament.

Bracket Format edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

I fail to see why one would not use a regular 128-seed bracket. If one were to go to the official website, it is clear that that is the format which is used. The seeded players are listed in the first round with respect to Byes.--Leonidas1982 (talk) 14:46, 10 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

I've redone the bracket to reflect the format that is used by Indian Wells' official website and other tennis authorities.--Leonidas1982 (talk) 21:51, 10 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

But if Wikipedia can potentially improve the the layout, it should. We can tabulate it whichever way is most suitable - for example, using a bracket system that has been created to accommodate for byes. I just thinking writing BYE all the time looks ugly, especially in the wikitables; whereas these[1][2] look much more streamlined. Whether or not one system is advantageous to the editor is really a moot point; it won't matter after the tournament has finished. If you think the 'BYE's add to the reader's understanding of the draw, then simply writing a sentence saying that the top 8 seeds receive a bye would sort that problem. It would be better to have a disclaimer than the word BYE dotted around everywhere.

I feel I'm just sticking to what is protocol, the established method on Masters Series draws - why should it be changed? Yohan euan o4 (talk) 16:28, 11 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Protocol in what sense? Tennis brackets are never displayed in this manner. As is evident by tennis authorities (ATP, WTA, and the official Indian Wells Draw), the proper method is to display seeded players in the first round, regardless of byes. It should never be the case for wikipedia to create a method that is foreign due to one's personal preference. Wikipedia is about about facts. What is not fact is the abridged bracket which is not used by tennis authorities.--Leonidas1982 (talk) 17:50, 15 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Protocol in the sense that it's what past Masters Series draws have used. The facts are still present, they aren't distorted whatsoever. I don't feel the Wikitables aren't particularly suitable; the writing is a lot more condensed in these brackets than on the official drawsheets. This is my opinion, but it's backed up by previous Masters Series draws (on Wikipedia), which I haven't participated in. I'd like to hear some other people's views on this, though. Yohan euan o4 (talk) 13:09, 17 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Add topic