Talk:¡Santiago!

Latest comment: 8 years ago by 78.29.252.101 in topic Inconsistent Controversy section

Blacklisted edit

I tried to fix the error message about reslist, but it would not accept the correction because a trouble with blacklist. There also should be a correction of the Notes section to put it in Wikipedia format. I don't have the knowledge to fix all of this. TomS TDotO (talk) 20:40, 25 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

What relist? What blacklist? I'm afraid I don't understand. Oreo Priest talk 13:01, 1 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Inconsistent Controversy section edit

The Controversy section claims that "the battle where it was first cried is considered a myth". However, the article states that it was first used at the battle of Las Navas de Tolosa, which was a very real battle with important historical consequences. I suppose the writer was thinking of the battle of Covadonga instead. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.0.53.131 (talk) 17:41, 24 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Good catch. I'm not really sure what the author meant to say. I've deleted the offending sentence. Oreo Priest talk 22:45, 24 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

"the term Spain was not used at the time, when many different kingdoms existed (Galiza, Portugal, Castilla, Aragon, Navarra...) and different dynastic houses fought in competence for the hegemonic domain over territories. At most, Hispania would be a geographic denomination which often was applied to the non-Christian territories." that is not true https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imperator_totius_Hispaniae ```` — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.29.252.101 (talk) 23:19, 2 September 2015 (UTC)Reply