Wikipedia:WikiProject Film/Peer review/The Little Shop of Horrors

The Little Shop of Horrors

Famous and important cult film. Any thoughts on the article? (Ibaranoff24 07:20, 8 December 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Reception section? Cbrown1023 03:20, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguatrion issues? Too many references to "little shop of horrors" without being clear which version (1960, 1982 musical, 1986) is meant? FT2 ^{(Talk | email)} 02:03, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- You moved it, so I renamed the section... but we don't need to move this page too... Cbrown1023 04:19, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'd like to see the cite templates implemented, or at least the equivalent information. (Retrieved, work, etc.) The JPS ^{talk to me} 13:22, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Supernumerary

Less plot, more summary.
The lead is supposed to summarize the article, but this lead mentions the sequels, which never appear in the article proper.
The pictures really help the article, and they are properly licensed. Nice work there.
Standardize the cast section and move it up to after the plot per the style guidelines.
Use the cite web format for your sources.
Consider adding a "See also" section. (Roger Corman was the king of B-movies and should be put there.)
- Um, try to avoid that... :) It's like a trivia section. A lot of people hate those (and trivia sections) and will be very sad to see it there. (by that I mean fail it for GA or not pass it on FA; they're real sticklers!!). Try to have all the links you need in the article itself. Cbrown1023 03:37, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
External links should be fleshed out with links to IMDB, rotten tomatoes, etc. Also, google video has the whole film uploaded, which definitely needs to be linked.
- Make sure that you don't WP:SPAM either. None of the sites Supernumerary listed are "spam", but be aware of it. Cbrown1023 03:38, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Does the film really star the 15 actors listed in the infobox? The article even says that Nicholson only had a bit part.
- Second that definately! Cbrown1023 03:38, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  - I cut it down to four, if more should be there, re add them. Cbrown1023 03:40, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Wikilink full dates.
- only full dates. Cbrown1023 03:38, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I second the reception section.