December 21 edit

Template:Special A edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete --עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 15:07, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Special A (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not used in any articles. Peachey88 (Talk Page | Contribs) 10:42, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. It looks as though this template was created with character articles in mind, but this template has been rendered useless seeing as there are no such articles. Bettia (rawr!) 11:39, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Series infoboxen are discouraged in favour of {{infobox character}} these days already, so best nipping this one in the bud if it's unused. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 11:51, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Too many photos edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep --User:Woohookitty Diamming fool! 09:01, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Too many photos (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not used in any articles. Was apparently used in one article but removed (see here). Doesn't seem like a common enough problem to warrant another template and it doesn't hold to any guidelines anyway. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshellsOtter chirpsHELP) 01:02, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • If it's a legit issue, then why isn't this template on any articles? And why has it only ever been on one or two, from which it was removed without complaint? Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshellsOtter chirpsHELP) 18:47, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Lack of use does not indicate uselessness. It's only four months old, and wasn't included in any cleanup categories until I just added one there. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 20:58, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.