December 13 edit

Template:Suburbs of Port Stephens edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Speedy keep Disruptive nomination, Aussie's evidence has me convinced. NAC. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshellsOtter chirpsHELP) 22:17, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Suburbs of Port Stephens (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Does not seem to be useful. I mean, c'mon! Suburbs? Every template like this i've seen has been deleted. Encyclopedia77 Talk 21:10, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Speedy keep This is just another WP:IDONTLIKEIT nomination by this editor,[1] made as revenge because I've nominated several of his templates for deletion.[2][3][4][5] This editor has become a serial pest who has never left his very recent days as a a vandal[6][7] behind. (see comments by other editors here) The template itself is obviously a valid navigational template, as used on many articles.[8] The mere fact that the nominator states that "Every template like this i've seen has been deleted" is an indication that he obviously hasn't bothered looking too hard. --AussieLegend (talk) 21:52, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:BAMracing edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 18:21, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:BAMracing (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Team has not run recently, and only ran in one series. Most pages link back to each other. D-Day (talk) 18:47, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Charity Organization edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 18:21, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Charity Organization (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused instance of {{Infobox Organization}}. Speedy? Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 18:46, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Mongolianfilmlist edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 18:22, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Mongolianfilmlist (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Excessive red links (and I've already merged the stubby 1930s and 1940s lists into the main one), and only one transclusion. As it stands we simply don't have enough Mongolian film-related content to make any kind of nav template justifiable. PC78 (talk) 12:58, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak keep The content isn't there yet, but it could very easily be. This template could very likely be retained as a jumping off point for contributors. This is one case where I have very little doubt that the many red links will turn blue. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshellsOtter chirpsHELP) 02:44, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • How so? This template was created 18 months ago and the redlinked list articles have not been forthcoming. IMDb only lists a mere 27 Mongolian films [9], and at present we only have articles for 5; that doesn't suggest to me that List of Mongolian films needs breaking down by year or even decade. A more suitable navtemplate can always be created in the future when the level of our content demands it, but we're a long way from that point at the moment. I've now orphaned the template, as it serves no reasonable purpose in Cinema of Mongolia (replaced with a "see also" link to the list article). PC78 (talk) 11:24, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - No indication that List of Mongolian films will need to be split in the foreseeable future. --Latebird (talk) 14:52, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - unnecessary for now; we don't need a navigational template until we have the content to navigate between. Terraxos (talk) 17:43, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:20/20 club edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was G8 as dependent on redlink parent. NAC. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshellsOtter chirpsHELP) 02:41, 14 December 2008 (UTC):Template:20/20 club (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) The article on which this template is based was recently deleted as a result of an AfD discussion. The template should also fail as non-notable and original research. 2008Olympianchitchat 05:42, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

AFC Champions League club templates edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete all. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 17:08, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dublettes of AFC Champions League club templates
Template:Fb team Dalian Shide (CHN) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) and
Category:Fb team templates AFC Champions League(edit talk links history) per WP:CFD
Template:Fb team Esteghlal (IRI) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) and
Category:Fb team templates AFC Champions League(edit talk links history) per WP:CFD
Template:Fb team Kashima Antlers (JPN) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) and
Category:Fb team templates AFC Champions League(edit talk links history) per WP:CFD
Template:Fb team Persepolis (IRI) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) and
Category:Fb team templates AFC Champions League(edit talk links history) per WP:CFD
Template:Fb team Shanghai Shenhua (CHN) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) and
Category:Fb team templates AFC Champions League(edit talk links history) per WP:CFD
Template:Fb team Shimizu S-Pulse (JPN) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) and
Category:Fb team templates AFC Champions League(edit talk links history) per WP:CFD

Dublettes of already existing templates. The original templates can be found in the following subcategories of Category:Fb team templates: Category:Fb team templates China (Dalian Shide and Shanghai Shenhua), Category:Fb team templates Iran (Esteghlal and Persepolis) and Category:Fb team templates Japan (Kashima Antlers and Shimizu S-Pulse).Hockey-holic (talk) 01:56, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete all - entirely redundant. (I'm not sure that we even need the existing templates to begin with, but that's a discussion for another time...) Terraxos (talk) 17:42, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all per above. – PeeJay 15:27, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.