Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2007 November 22

< November 21	November 23 >

November 22 edit

Template:Davey Moore edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10(Говорить!) 00:36, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just an odd sort of anomoly. A template designed to make two article intros the same. Subst'ed for the one article in which it was actually used. Cheers! BD2412 T 02:10, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

Delete - Templates should not be used to share content for articles in such a manner. 69.177.214.184 (talk) 02:36, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as an improper use for a template. JPG-GR (talk) 23:49, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per JPG-GR. jj137 (Talk) 03:27, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per JPG-GR, improper use. SkierRMH (talk) 03:59, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:New edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10(Говорить!) 00:36, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Probably a failed idea. The template was designed to tag new articles and put them into Category:New articles. We have so many other tags out there this is assumedly redundant as a result. Also, all the articles tagged with this when i looked were from March, June and way back (i.e. not new), but I removed the tags from them. — Montchav (talk) 00:17, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment shouldn't this be handled at WP:SFD stub-types for deletion? 132.205.99.122 (talk) 22:16, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I don't think this will be very useful, and may just annoy most people. jj137 (Talk) 03:26, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per the talk page, it is redundant to other cleanup templates. SkierRMH (talk) 03:58, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Redundant template. Superceded by superior and more specific tags. Flibirigit (talk) 11:00, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Redundant and ages badly. —Scott5114 ↗ 02:28, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.