Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2007 May 24

< May 23	May 25 >

May 24 edit

Template:Model info edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10(Don't ask 'bout Camden) 00:50, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Appears to be an unused and incompete infobox template, and is a duplicate of Template:Female adult bio anyway. — PC78 23:33, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I agree, per nomination. Not used, and is never going to be used. A copy. Jmlk 17 05:28, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Obviously an abandoned template. --ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 01:18, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Tables with one transclusion edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deletion of all. RyanGerbil10(Don't ask 'bout Camden) 00:54, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is only used on one page. Should be subst and deleted. Balloonguy 20:34, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I have combined these five nominations into one, since I believe that the nominator thinks they should all be substituted and deleted for the same reason (and indeed, his text was the same for all of the nominations.) This would be a useful time to have a Table namespace. Gracenotes^T § 03:06, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete They should be tables, not templates. Unnecessary and wasteful. Jmlk 17 05:29, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Obviously an abandoned template. --ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 12:12, 27 May 2007 (UTC) Sorry, voted at the wrong place. I meant for Template:Model info. --ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 01:18, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Subst then delete - Should be tables within articles. Orderinchaos 16:00, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:National Anthems edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10(Don't ask 'bout Camden) 00:58, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Originally created to substitute the others templates, but it was duplicate of Template:Nationalanthemsoftheworld and out of standard format. — Guilherme ^(t/c) 17:47, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Support. No problem. Badagnani 18:19, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. per duplication. Carlosguitar 18:38, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as redundant to other nat. anthem template. —dima /talk/ 00:36, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The template just doesn't belong around here. Useless and time to delete. Jmlk 17 05:26, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. per duplication. --Cerejota 08:13, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:R&AW edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10(Don't ask 'bout Camden) 01:00, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox can only be used on one page, is currently subst:ed and not used on any articles. — Paul^C/_T+ 10:44, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete single-use. –Pomte 20:27, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:MTV Films edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deletion of MTV films, no consensus for Bungie. RyanGerbil10(Don't ask 'bout Camden) 03:36, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Individual movie studios should not have their own templates. None of the movies are related to each other at all, precedent is set with deletion of WWE Films template (see Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2007 February 7) Biggspowd 05:22, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, studios such as bungie have their own templates. Maybe this should be considered for deletion as well?Template:Bungie_Studios --MunchableSandwich 14:26, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Rob T Firefly 05:17, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Reluctant delete per nom; perhaps make it a catergory? Fhb3 20:37, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Paygame edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. KFP (talk | contribs) 14:04, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not useful. --Iamunknown 04:47, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete do any games even use this? --MunchableSandwich 14:02, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete seems unnecessary. Carlosguitar 19:24, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Carlosguitar. —dima /talk/ 00:44, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete Is this seriously even a template? Not even sure why it was created, as it is not even used. Jmlk 17 05:28, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as CSD G1. Clyde (a.k.a Mystytopia) 22:28, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.