Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2006 September 26

< September 25	September 27 >

September 26 edit

Template:ToC1964PacificTyphoonSeason edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delettion. RyanG e rbil10(Kick 'em in the dishpan!) 16:15, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is a template made for 1964 Pacific typhoon season. However, this template is unneeded, and consists of original research ("ID" stands for "investigated depressions", which is not an official term, and is not the same as "invest"). The template is also orphaned. --Core des at talk! 17:43, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. The OR here is really bad - it's a made-up designation for storms the user has no idea about and is "investigating", making this template unencyclopedic as well. – Ch acor 17:50, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"made-up designation for storms the user has no idea about". What the heck do you mean?! I'm trying to adjust to the JTWC archives for one thing. That was an unnescessary comment.HurricaneCraze32 aka Mitchazenia 12:28, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There is no such thing as an "investigated tropical depression", that term you used is made up. "Storm the user has no idea about" referring to systems you have no information on - but that's not a reason to add it to the template. – Ch acor 12:31, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, i came up with the name, i'll fix it if you want. The JTWC has no information except their formation date and dissipation date. 2W,11W,26W,40W & 52W are all the regular depressions that existed.

6W,16W,23W,28W,31W,42W,47W and 50W are the investigated ones-totaling to 52 depressions.HurricaneCraze32 aka Mitchazenia 12:37, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

All fixed-all 9 ID's have become TD's and if you highlight it, it says tropical depression.HurricaneCraze32 aka Mitchazenia 12:44, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the point is that it really isn't needed. The normal TOC is enough. – Ch acor 12:49, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Template:Infobox Country rv edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanG e rbil10(Kick 'em in the dishpan!) 16:16, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unused test. Docu 05:14, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Template:Nfpa edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanG e rbil10(Kick 'em in the dishpan!) 16:17, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

NFPA 704 fire diamond. Old version; obsoleted by {{NFPA 704}}; all instances replaced. -- Denelson 83 08:16, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Template:ChavezHonors edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanG e rbil10(Kick 'em in the dishpan!) 16:18, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Outdated info from article; not a template & not in use. Ling.Nut 16:22, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Template:Phil-org-stub edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanG e rbil10(Kick 'em in the dishpan!) 16:19, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Superseded by new template with clearer name. ({{philanthropy-org-stub}}) ♥ Her Pegship♥ 00:27, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.