Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2006 October 15

< October 14	October 16 >

October 15 edit

Template:User Indies edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was irrelevant. RyanG e rbil10(Упражнение В!) 00:23, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template has been GUSed to User:EVula/Userboxes/Indies. All instances have been updated, and no userpages link to the template. EVula 20:33, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Template:Infobox Country Economy edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanG e rbil10(Упражнение В!) 00:24, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This template is not used anymore (it used to be used in Economy of Turkey) and it is redundant to Template:Infobox Economy, which is used in more than 30 articles, including that one. LittleDan^talk 19:29, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral: I have no problems with deleting that (despite having obliterated hS there in vain. It simply was on my list :-). --Ligulem 22:10, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, though I sympathize with Ligulem. :) Xtifr _tälk 23:04, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, redundant. --Ter e nce Ong _{(T | C)} 10:08, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Template:User Les Mis edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was irrelevant. RyanG e rbil10(Упражнение В!) 00:26, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template has been GUSed to User:EVula/Userboxes/Les Mis. All instances have been updated, and no userpages link to the template. EVula 19:25, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Template:PDFlink1 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanG e rbil10(Упражнение В!) 00:26, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not used, same functionality provided by {{PDFlink}} — Omegatron 19:05, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Template:Cleanup-infobox-transclusion edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanG e rbil10(Упражнение В!) 00:29, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ugly, ambiguous template that shows readers nothing and is liable to confuse them, and violates WP:ASR. Stifle (talk) 18:57, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Possibly replace with categorisation of the relevant pages as "WhatLinksHere" does not show up the problem. Ansell 07:26, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Template:The Seven World Wonders edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was super-deletion. RyanG e rbil10(Упражнение В!) 00:38, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unencyclopedic, arbitrary, inherently POV template. Does not correspond to any "official" list of Seven Wonders of the World nor to the contents of the article Seven Wonders of the World (which is a redirect), Seven Wonders of the Modern World (which is a redirect), or any of the articles listed in Wonders of the World (disambiguation); header does not even link to a relevant list or article, but simply to the article World. Delete. MCB 18:24, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, per nom. Cedars 01:04, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
OH MY GOD, DELETE!!! Who came up with this mess??? No relation to any list of the so-called "Seven Wonders", classic, modern, or underwater. Die, die, DIE!!!--Nemonoman 02:31, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, don't see a need for such a temple. --Ter e nce Ong _{(T | C)} 10:02, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and quickly Amazingly goofy. Or send it to the Uncyclopedia, it would fit in there.--In ur base, killing ur dorfs 19:32, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Template:David Morgan-Mar edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanG e rbil10(Упражнение В!) 00:41, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Partly procedural nomination: expired WP:PROD with the reason "limited use navigational template". That is true and a good reason for deletion. However, due to the noincluded prod it was not visible on pages using the template that it was proposed for deletion, so for the sake of visibility of the deletion debate, I am nominating for TfD instead. Delete as limited use navigation template. Kusma (討論) 12:20, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I don't see any reason to have a navigation template for three articles. bogdan 12:32, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Punkmorten 12:13, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Some background: the template used to be larger (7 articles), but many of the articles were AfDd. The navbox is no longer particularly useful. --ais523 17:18, 18 October 2006 (U T C)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Template:The Stars of Steaua edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanG e rbil10(Упражнение В!) 00:42, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Including some players in a list of "stars" is POV. bogdan 08:26, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Punkmorten 12:13, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I can't see a reason why this template should be deleted. Red Star Belgrade has one...--Oliviu 17:02, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Note that the Stars of Red Stars is actually a distinction given by the club, not just a random list of players... bogdan 17:17, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Template:Marathon Fan-Made Scenarios edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanG e rbil10(Упражнение В!) 00:44, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Everything that was linked to this template got deleted so template isn't needed anymore. Whispering 12:22, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. EVula 21:38, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Cedars 01:02, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per nom. Daniel5127 (Talk) 04:57, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Template:Infobox Modern Cricketer edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this entry.

The result of the debate was Moved to userspace. --Ligulem 08:52, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Would need removal of defunct Wikipedia:hiddenStructure if no consensus for deletion. Ligulem 16:38, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, This template is useful in near future. Because now Asian teams agreed to play Twenty20. Shyam ^(T/C) 16:41, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. No problem with keeping this. Just thought it might not be needed anymore, since you created it in February and it is still unused. However, you could move it to under your userspace (For example to User:Shyam_Bihari/Infobox Modern Cricketer) until there is some actual need for this template. For the moment, I've obliterated the hiddenStructure stuff there, so it is now clean. Please check if it is still working as expected (a bit difficult absent a single transclusion). --Ligulem 21:22, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Ligulem, I have moved the page to my user space. Shyam ^(T/C) 03:31, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox OnlineGamingOrganizations edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanG e rbil10(Упражнение В!) 00:45, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Would need removal of defunct Wikipedia:hiddenStructure if no consensus for deletion. Ligulem 21:50, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Template:Infobox Polish Lithuanian monarch edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanG e rbil10(Упражнение В!) 00:46, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Would need removal of defunct Wikipedia:hiddenStructure if no consensus for deletion. Resembles a lot to template:Infobox Polish monarch, which I've obliterated from hS. Ligulem 22:26, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete there is another template that would work just as well. EVula 21:39, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Template:Melbourne Station Infobox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanG e rbil10(Упражнение В!) 00:47, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Would need removal of defunct Wikipedia:hiddenStructure if no consensus for deletion. Ligulem 22:39, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Template:MLSCupInfo edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanG e rbil10(Упражнение В!) 00:48, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Would need removal of defunct Wikipedia:hiddenStructure if no consensus for deletion. Ligulem 22:51, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.