orphaned image, sole contribution of user, unencyclopedic, the text that is inclued in the summary is nonsense. Jordan 1972 (talk) 00:02, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned image, absent uploader, an unencylopedic photo of junk stuff. The text included is nonsense. Jordan 1972 (talk) 00:03, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned image, absent uploader, I question the PD-self license as this appears to be a professionally shot photo. Jordan 1972 (talk) 00:08, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned image, absent uploader, low quality image due to image framing, unsure of an encyclopedic use Jordan 1972 (talk) 01:06, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Photoshopped image for humor purposes used on uploaders user page. Source information is too dubious and unreliable to trust.. Otterathome (talk) 01:28, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Unused personal photo, also a contradictory public domain but allowed only on Wikipedia type license. Sherool(talk) 18:22, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
