Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2008 October 17

< Wikipedia:Files for deletion
(Redirected from Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion/2008 October 17)
< October 16 October 18 >

October 17

edit

Image:Sashafierce.jpg

edit
Image:Sashafierce.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by SHOWCONFIG (notify | contribs).

Image:Sasha2fierce.jpg

edit
Image:Sasha2fierce.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by SHOWCONFIG (notify | contribs).

Image:I Am... (Beyoncé Knowles album)-1.jpg

edit
Image:I Am... (Beyoncé Knowles album)-1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Noboyo (notify | contribs).
  • Wal-Mart has delete the album's entry from their website. Because of this, image cannot be deemed reliable. Alkclark (talk) 16:07, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak delete. Actually, it seems both entries are still there (as are the images), although they're listed under "Music for DELETION". (!) But I do agree that the uncertain status of the pictures at least requires adjusting the current boilerplate non-free use rationale, which is written with the assumption that the cover art is unquestionably official. Perhaps more to the point, we're not Wikileaks: we're supposed to pay some attention to copyright owner's financial interests when using non-free material, and the withdrawal (half-assed though it may be) at least suggests the possibility that the record company might have an interest in keeping the covers secret until the album is released. (Good luck to them, I'm sure everyone and their bldog has already grabbed a copy, but that's not really the issue; WP:NFCC#2 — and possibly #4 as well — is.) Might be best just to delete the images for now and wait until the album is officially published: then we can reupload them to illustrate both the album and, whether or not they turn out to be official, the probably inevitable "Wal-Mart leaks Beyoncé's new album cover" story. —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 20:24, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:I Am... (Beyoncé Knowles album)-2.jpg

edit
Image:I Am... (Beyoncé Knowles album)-2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Noboyo (notify | contribs).

Image:Davids.jpg

edit
Image:Davids.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Urkelkid1978 (notify | contribs).

Image:AndyBrural.JPEG.jpg

edit
Image:AndyBrural.JPEG.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by XPatchx (notify | contribs).

Image:88gpmg08.jpg

edit
Image:88gpmg08.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Proelitez (notify | contribs).

Image:Theaterfestival.gif

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: keep - original concerns addressed - Papa November (talk) 09:54, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Theaterfestival.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Pascaweb (notify | contribs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Image:RebuildTheWall-06-Mother(30s).ogg

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: - Keep - Use and rationale satisfies NFCC#8. There appears to be sufficient sourced commentary Peripitus (Talk) 12:13, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:RebuildTheWall-06-Mother(30s).ogg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Eleland (notify | contribs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. No need to see the book cover to understand the article. Fails WP:NFCC#8. -Nv8200p talk 16:34, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Roll the dice.jpg

edit
Image:Roll the dice.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Colonel Warden (notify | contribs).
  • Originally deleted as invalid fair use; deletion review suggested listing here. In the view of several participants in the DRV, this image does not meet our fair use guidelines; it is an illustration of the book used as the lead image in a biography of the author, and in that role it is replaceable. Chick Bowen 16:18, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep The book is discussed in the article which the image illustrates and this conforms to the language of the fair use licence used. The book is an autobiography and so the author and the book are naturally inter-related. Splitting the article would not be helpful to our readership and it is sensible to keep this material together. Colonel Warden (talk) 18:24, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - While the existance of the book is discussed, the image of the book is not. Commentary of the order of Billy_Ripken#1989_baseball_card where the image is required for the text to make sense is needed. A free image of the Author is clearly creatable and would for readers replace this one so the image fails NFCC#1. The book is commented on by sources, but the cover is not and it's use in this article is purely decorative - Peripitus (Talk) 22:38, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • No, discussion of the cover is not required - your contention is absurd and goes far beyond our consensus on fair use of such matters. For example, I just checked a couple of book articles - The Lord of the Rings and Casino Royale (novel) where cover images are used as fair use without the cover itself being discussed. Such images are like a quotation from the work and are well-recognised by copyright law as being fair use in articles of education, commentary and criticism. Acceptance of your doctrine would lead to massive disruption of many articles - books, albums, DVD, games, etc - for which cover images are routinely used. If you think this doctrine is established then please cite. Otherwise, a sweeping decision of that sort would require significant input from Village Pump or the like. Colonel Warden (talk) 10:53, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The difference with those two examples is that an image of a book illustrates an article on a book. Long standing consensus here (as documented in WP:NFC) is that such illustration is, for wikipedia purposes, fair-use. Please see WP:NFC, unnacceptable use (images) points 8 and 12; at least one of which covers using this image in the article about the author. The issue is not about using an image of a thing to illustrate an article on that thing, it is claiming fair-use to illustrate a different article. Admittedly Wikipedia policy goes further than required for a strict legal interpretation of fair-use, though nowhere near as far as the German wiki - Peripitus (Talk) 12:28, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
There is no difference since the image illustrates a section about the book and there is no separate article about the book - just redirects to this article. We are not required to split articles for this purpose because an article with multiple sections is effectively the same as two separate articles since the article/section distinction is purely a Wikipedia technical format issue with no legal standing. Section 7 in WP:NFC is therefore applicable. Colonel Warden (talk) 16:48, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Poor use of a non-free image. The article, while containing a brief discussion of the subject's autobiography, is not about that autobiography. Wikilawyering in order to keep an image which primarily serves to identify the subject of a BLP makes no difference -- we don't use non-free images to illustrate BLPs unless it can be successfully argued that such images aren't freely replaceable. The uploader has offered no argument that a free image of Darius Guppy can't reasonably be made or found. Lu Ta 19:08, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Image:2_MADE.PNG

edit
Image:2_MADE.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Socks_01 (notify | contribs).
Please see these ones also:
--OsamaK 18:30, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:75x75blank.jpg

edit
Image:75x75blank.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by DrKC9N (notify | contribs).

Image:AE_Euro.png

edit
Image:AE_Euro.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Rbb_l181 (notify | contribs).

Image:93user.gif

edit
Image:93user.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Frater5 (notify | contribs).

Image:Henrypaul copy.jpg

edit
Image:Henrypaul copy.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Jones629 (notify | contribs).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep per WP:AGF. -Nv8200p talk 16:36, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Rustyonhousefloor.jpg

edit
Image:Rustyonhousefloor.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Jones629 (notify | contribs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Image:311wacker.jpg

edit
Image:311wacker.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Spyguy_999 (notify | contribs).

Image:3327R.jpg

edit
Image:3327R.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Wendy.heah (notify | contribs).

Image:A_garage.jpg

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Keep. Unorphaned. —Wknight94 (talk) 02:31, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:A_garage.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Web_kai2000 (notify | contribs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Image:AC_A340-313X_C-FYLU.jpg

edit
Image:AC_A340-313X_C-FYLU.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by E_Pluribus_Anthony (notify | contribs).
I have flagged it as a speedy for copy vio of http://www.planespotters.net/Aviation_Photos/photo.show?id=001042. MilborneOne (talk) 12:53, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:ALittleBitter.jpg

edit
Image:ALittleBitter.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Paddy_armagh (notify | contribs).

Image:TheBlood.jpg

edit
Image:TheBlood.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Paddy_armagh (notify | contribs).

Image:Brian.Burnell.jpg

edit
Image:Brian.Burnell.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Brian.Burnell (notify | contribs).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Files_for_deletion/2008_October_17&oldid=1051964681"