Neverwinter Nights 2 edit

Articles comprosing the topic are sufficiently well sourced, no major issues with the articles. It meets most, if not all, the Featured Topic criteria. —Ғяіᴆaз'§ĐøøмChampagne?9:38pm 11:38, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • This is already a good topic; it can't be a featured topic until at least two (more if the topic is expanded) articles are featured. Ucucha 11:47, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose suggest withdrawal - meeting "most" FT criteria is not enough, it has to meet all of them, one of which is that at least 50% of the content must be featured, which clearly isn't the case -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 18:19, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Quick close? Nergaal (talk) 00:59, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Moved nom from FTC to GTC. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 02:31, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • It is already a GT. I'll leave it to FD to explain why this should be a featured topic while none of the components are featured. Ucucha 02:33, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
      • Oh; in that case I'm not sure why it's at FTC then. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 03:22, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
        • The nominator probably did not understand the criteria well. Quickclose? Nergaal (talk) 03:43, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
          • I suppose so. We might wait for a response by FD, but he's been active elsewhere and hasn't posted here again. Ucucha 03:48, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]