Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/File:Grizzly Denali edit.jpg

Denali Park Grizzly edit

 
Grizzly bear at Denali National Park.
Reason
This only shows the top half (or less) of the animal, and has already been removed from articles about bears, so its EV might not be as high as previously thought. If you're wondering about the background: yes, some bits have been cloned in.
Articles this image appears in
List of mammals of Alaska, List of mammals of Canada, Denali National Park and Preserve
Previous nomination/s
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Grizzly Denali edit.jpg
Nominator
Papa Lima Whiskey (talk) , seconded by J Milburn [1]
  • DelistPapa Lima Whiskey (talk) 19:42, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delist half the bear is obscured... — raeky (talk | edits) 19:58, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep It was judged to be FP at one time and the only thing that has changed is the number of articles it is in. I love the eye-catching colors here, so I went in search of an EV-based justification. It is currently being used on Denali National Park and Preserve, List of mammals of Alaska and List of mammals of Canada and is used on wide variety of other-language Wikipedias. It’s a fine picture. I see no need to see this one expunged from the FP-thumb world. Greg L (talk) 01:16, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • Again, the argument is not to stop using it, but to stop *featuring* it. And what other Wikipedias do is of no particular consequence. Papa Lima Whiskey (talk) 10:27, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delist. Yeah, it's pretty, and yeah, "it's a fine picture", but it has minimal EV. It reminds me of The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion; a lovely concept shot, and would look great in a brochure for the park, but it's not really demonstrating much here. J Milburn (talk) 11:06, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delist: Under par. Maedin\talk 16:53, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kept --Makeemlighter (talk) 01:33, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]