Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/File:2099725 FreightElevator 135wb.jpg

Alexz Johnson edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Apr 2011 at 04:15:42 (UTC)

 
The current FP, an edit of the original image
 
The original image, which did not gain consensus
 
Another edit, which was not the preferred edit
Reason
This image never really made it into the Alexz Johnson or Jude Harrison articles. I made the original promotion of the edit and replaced the original image in the articles per FPC closing procedure. The edit was then promptly removed. I replaced it, and it was again removed. I tried to start a discussion, but it didn't really go anywhere. I don't particularly care if any version of this image is featured. It just doesn't make sense to keep the edit as an FP when the original is used in the most relevant articles. Any of the following would be acceptable outcomes: delist the edit; delist the edit and replace it as FP with the original; or keep the edit and replace the original in the articles.
Articles this image appears in
Instant Star soundtracks
Previous nomination/s
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Alexz Johnson
Nominator
Makeemlighter (talk)
  • NeutralMakeemlighter (talk) 04:15, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Use FP in article it has more realistic colours. --99of9 (talk) 13:05, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep current FP, that is the one used in the article. I'm not convinced by the arguments made to use the yellower image in any of the preceding discussions. Googling Jude Harrison and Alexz Johnson shows that this is the only time she's in the Simpsons; the current FP is a more accurate representation of her and the character. Cowtowner (talk) 01:30, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep current FP. Better colors. The only editor (Jfitch) arguing for the yellow-ish version has not edited in some time; we can revisit the issue if he wants to bring it up. Jujutacular talk 17:04, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep current FP: It's been placed back into the articles (by someone not typically around FPC), where it should have been all along. If Jfitch insists again, it's not a matter for FPC but for some form of conflict resolution—plenty of venues better suited to dealing with it. Maedin\talk 23:20, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep current FP. As someone somewhat sympathetic to Jfitch's arguments, I have to agree with the above. If a RfC or something similar determines that the other image should be used, so be it, but until then... J Milburn (talk) 10:46, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept --Makeemlighter (talk) 08:39, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]