Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Baby Posture.jpg
Baby Posture edit
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 26 Mar 2012 at 14:54:56 (UTC)
- Reason
- good quality and frame
- Articles in which this image appears
- Posture (psychology)
- FP category for this image
- psychology
- Creator
- User:Alborzagros
- Support as nominator --Alborzagros (talk) 14:54, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
- Comment Image hasn't been in the article at least 1 week. Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:24, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose Not adding significantly to the article it is in and I'm doubtful there is such a thing as a "baby posture". More like a "cute pose", of which there are endless possibilities. Technically, the picture suffers from being taken with a compact camera in terms of noise and sharpness. There's strong vignetting at the corners. Also, a picture of a child in a private place needs some evidence of permission (see Commons:Photographs of identifiable people). It is a nice picture, but not outstanding. It could be improved a little by cropping in a portrait orientation to eliminate some of the wall and the corner vignetting. Colin°Talk 19:09, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose A beautiful child, like most children are, and a nice posture. Also, probably a very special one for the photographer or the nominator. But it doesn't have any significant encyclopaedic value and image quality is on the poor side. Alvesgaspar (talk) 23:49, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose. Snapshot. Cute, but a snapshot. Clegs (talk) 09:04, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose Don't see the EV. Nothing very unique about this picture... I have 100 just like it of my niece and nephew. Dusty777 (talk) 17:26, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
- It's a really nice image, and I personally like the vignetting. But people are right, that the encyclopedic value of it is a bit lacking. Please keep taking photos, though! Aaadddaaammm (talk) 18:30, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
Not Promoted --Makeemlighter (talk) 21:09, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
