The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page. No further edits should be made to this page. The closing editor's comments were: 3 days, 0 support, 4 oppose. The result was Fail.
I think that the List of auxiliary Interstate Highways could meet the criteria for the Featured lists. It is organized in an organized manner and creating an informative table listing brief information about every auxiliary Interstate, whether proposed or unsigned.
Oppose. The lead is too small. It should include a description about the highway system in the USA, the naming and numbering system of auxiliary highway system, plus if it's possible some interesting facts (the oldest, the longest, the number of highways in construction...) CG 09:40, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Agree. Although I did nominate it, you're right. I thought this list was missing a lot of important things. I think the article needs more time. To all the others, what do you all think? Does anybody agree to the nomation or oppose?
Oppose until the weak lead is fixed. There isn't even any boldface text in the first sentence, as there should be with 99% of articles/lists. -- Phoenix2(holla) 16:01, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Nothing is referenced other than the lengths of the highways. Toohool 20:55, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. The intro is too brief for a list that is this long and needs more references as well. Hydrogen Iodide(HI!) 05:10, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
